Legal Implication the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 67/PUU-X/2013 on Creditor Concurrent's Rights in Bankruptcy Case

Shokib Mahendra, A. Sulistiyono, E. Latifah
{"title":"Legal Implication the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 67/PUU-X/2013 on Creditor Concurrent's Rights in Bankruptcy Case","authors":"Shokib Mahendra, A. Sulistiyono, E. Latifah","doi":"10.2991/icglow-19.2019.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 67 / PUU-XI / 2013 is very interesting to study, it is because of after the decision, the repayment of workers’ payment in the case of bankruptcy of a company must take precedence over other creditors. On the one hand, the decision provides benefits to workers and in the opposite, it suffers the concurrent creditors because it is less likely to obtain debt repayments from debtors. Furthermore, this following question arise e.g. the protection of the concurrent creditors. This is not taken into discussion in the Constitutional Court decision No. 67 / PUU-XI / 2013 above, which implies the undermining the position of concurrent creditors and minimizing the guarantee of repayment of debts from bankrupt debtors. Keywords-Concurrent Creditors, Bankruptcy, Decision of the Constitutional Court","PeriodicalId":246077,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The implication of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 67 / PUU-XI / 2013 is very interesting to study, it is because of after the decision, the repayment of workers’ payment in the case of bankruptcy of a company must take precedence over other creditors. On the one hand, the decision provides benefits to workers and in the opposite, it suffers the concurrent creditors because it is less likely to obtain debt repayments from debtors. Furthermore, this following question arise e.g. the protection of the concurrent creditors. This is not taken into discussion in the Constitutional Court decision No. 67 / PUU-XI / 2013 above, which implies the undermining the position of concurrent creditors and minimizing the guarantee of repayment of debts from bankrupt debtors. Keywords-Concurrent Creditors, Bankruptcy, Decision of the Constitutional Court
宪法法院第67/PUU-X/2013号关于破产案件中债权人连带权利的判决的法律意义
一方面,该决定为工人提供了利益,另一方面,它遭受了同时债权人的损失,因为它不太可能从债务人那里获得债务偿还。此外,还会出现以下问题,例如对共同债权人的保护。关键词:共同债权人,破产,宪法法院判决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信