Libertarian Paternalism: Taking Econs Seriously

D. Wade Hands
{"title":"Libertarian Paternalism: Taking Econs Seriously","authors":"D. Wade Hands","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3267724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an extensive critical literature analyzing the libertarian paternalism (LP) of Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. This paper is critical as well, but does so from a different perspective than most of the existing research. Thaler and Sunstein characterize LP by at least two key features: i) a sharp distinction between Econs (those whose behavior will be unchanged by LP policies) and Humans (who will, at least potentially, change their behavior as a result of LP policies), and ii) defining Econs explicitly as homo economicus: \"the textbook picture of human beings offered by economists\" (Thaler and Sunstein, 2009, p. 7). This paper will take their definition of Econs seriously and examine the implications for LP-based policies. The bottom line is that if we take Econs seriously, LP nudges end up being not only extremely weak policy tools, but they also fail to accommodate some of the most important insights of behavioral economics.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an extensive critical literature analyzing the libertarian paternalism (LP) of Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. This paper is critical as well, but does so from a different perspective than most of the existing research. Thaler and Sunstein characterize LP by at least two key features: i) a sharp distinction between Econs (those whose behavior will be unchanged by LP policies) and Humans (who will, at least potentially, change their behavior as a result of LP policies), and ii) defining Econs explicitly as homo economicus: "the textbook picture of human beings offered by economists" (Thaler and Sunstein, 2009, p. 7). This paper will take their definition of Econs seriously and examine the implications for LP-based policies. The bottom line is that if we take Econs seriously, LP nudges end up being not only extremely weak policy tools, but they also fail to accommodate some of the most important insights of behavioral economics.
自由意志家长主义:认真对待经济学
有大量的批评文献分析了理查德·塞勒和卡斯·桑斯坦的自由意志家长制(LP)。这篇论文也是至关重要的,但它是从与大多数现有研究不同的角度来研究的。塞勒和桑斯坦至少通过两个关键特征来描述低成本经济:1)经济主体(其行为不会因低成本政策而改变的人)和人类(其行为至少可能会因低成本政策而改变)之间的明显区别;2)将经济主体明确定义为经济人。“经济学家提供的人类教科书图片”(塞勒和桑斯坦,2009年,第7页)。本文将认真对待他们对经济的定义,并研究其对基于lp的政策的影响。最重要的是,如果我们认真对待经济学,LP推动最终不仅是极其软弱的政策工具,而且它们也无法容纳行为经济学的一些最重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信