THE NLRB AND WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: A MANAGERIAL PERSPECTIVE ON APPLYING UNION RULES TO THE NONUNION WORKFORCE

J. F. Morgan, J. Owens, G. Gomes
{"title":"THE NLRB AND WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: A MANAGERIAL PERSPECTIVE ON APPLYING UNION RULES TO THE NONUNION WORKFORCE","authors":"J. F. Morgan, J. Owens, G. Gomes","doi":"10.2190/XDE7-C8ML-DYUT-DF9B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the new legal landscape for nonunion employers who contemplate conducting investigations of alleged wrongdoing by their employees. The National Labor Relations Board recently ruled that a certain right (the “Weingarten right”) previously guaranteed only to union members, applies equally to at-will employees in nonunion firms. As a result, all employees now possess the right to ask that a coworker be present during an investigatory interview. While the Weingarten right is sensible in a union environment, significant policy and practical problems arise when this right is extended to the nonunion environment. This article first examines the evolution of the Weingarten right. Next, we discuss the applicability of this right to the nonunion sector. Finally, we summarize the debate over the propriety of applying the Weingarten right to the nonunion workforce. Employers today cannot afford to ignore the importance of conducting investigations into allegations of workplace wrongdoing. Failure to reasonably and competently investigate claims or suspicions of employee wrongdoing may have significant economic impacts on the firm. For employers to receive a heightened","PeriodicalId":371129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Employment Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2190/XDE7-C8ML-DYUT-DF9B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article examines the new legal landscape for nonunion employers who contemplate conducting investigations of alleged wrongdoing by their employees. The National Labor Relations Board recently ruled that a certain right (the “Weingarten right”) previously guaranteed only to union members, applies equally to at-will employees in nonunion firms. As a result, all employees now possess the right to ask that a coworker be present during an investigatory interview. While the Weingarten right is sensible in a union environment, significant policy and practical problems arise when this right is extended to the nonunion environment. This article first examines the evolution of the Weingarten right. Next, we discuss the applicability of this right to the nonunion sector. Finally, we summarize the debate over the propriety of applying the Weingarten right to the nonunion workforce. Employers today cannot afford to ignore the importance of conducting investigations into allegations of workplace wrongdoing. Failure to reasonably and competently investigate claims or suspicions of employee wrongdoing may have significant economic impacts on the firm. For employers to receive a heightened
国家劳资关系委员会和工作场所调查:从管理角度看工会规则对非工会劳动力的应用
这篇文章探讨了新的法律景观,非工会雇主谁考虑进行调查,指控其雇员的不法行为。国家劳工关系委员会最近裁定,以前只保障工会成员的一项特定权利(“Weingarten权利”),同样适用于非工会公司的随意雇员。因此,所有员工现在都有权要求一名同事在调查面谈时在场。虽然Weingarten权利在工会环境中是合理的,但当这项权利扩展到非工会环境时,就会出现重大的政策和实际问题。本文首先考察了温加滕权利的演变。接下来,我们将讨论这一权利对非工会部门的适用性。最后,我们总结了关于将Weingarten权利适用于非工会劳动力的适当性的辩论。今天的雇主不能忽视对工作场所不法行为指控进行调查的重要性。对员工不当行为的指控或怀疑进行合理、有效的调查,可能会对公司产生重大的经济影响。为雇主获得加薪
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信