Comparison of time responses of an asymmetric modal filter obtained in different ways

Z. Kenzhegulova, R. Surovtsev, R. Khazhibekov
{"title":"Comparison of time responses of an asymmetric modal filter obtained in different ways","authors":"Z. Kenzhegulova, R. Surovtsev, R. Khazhibekov","doi":"10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of comparing the time responses at the end of the asymmetric MF obtained by different approaches are presented. For this purpose, time responses were obtained by analytical, quasi-static and electrodynamic approaches, as well as by measurements. When compared with the results of the quasistatic approach, almost complete coincidence of responses was revealed (within 2%). The maximum deviation when compared with the results of the electrodynamic approach was 8% in amplitude and 29% in the delay of the decomposition pulses. A comparison of the results obtained analytically and using measurements of the MF layout revealed deviations in amplitude of 21% for the first and 8.7% for the second pulses, respectively, and 2.2 and 3.9% for their delays.","PeriodicalId":273068,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-53-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The results of comparing the time responses at the end of the asymmetric MF obtained by different approaches are presented. For this purpose, time responses were obtained by analytical, quasi-static and electrodynamic approaches, as well as by measurements. When compared with the results of the quasistatic approach, almost complete coincidence of responses was revealed (within 2%). The maximum deviation when compared with the results of the electrodynamic approach was 8% in amplitude and 29% in the delay of the decomposition pulses. A comparison of the results obtained analytically and using measurements of the MF layout revealed deviations in amplitude of 21% for the first and 8.7% for the second pulses, respectively, and 2.2 and 3.9% for their delays.
不同方法得到的非对称模态滤波器时间响应的比较
比较了不同方法得到的非对称中频末端时间响应的结果。为此,通过解析、准静态和电动态方法以及测量获得了时间响应。与准静态方法的结果相比,几乎完全吻合(在2%以内)。与电动力学方法的结果相比,最大偏差在振幅上为8%,在分解脉冲的延迟上为29%。通过分析和测量得到的结果对比显示,第一脉冲和第二脉冲的振幅偏差分别为21%和8.7%,其延迟偏差分别为2.2%和3.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信