Contested consecrations and the pursuit of ecclesiastical independence in Scotland and Ireland in the early 1120s

Aideen O'leary
{"title":"Contested consecrations and the pursuit of ecclesiastical independence in Scotland and Ireland in the early 1120s","authors":"Aideen O'leary","doi":"10.26818/nortamerceltstud.2.2.0155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article investigates two comparable crises of leadership in Gaelic Christendom which occurred around the same time, in 1120–1121; these culminated in failed episcopal appointments for St. Andrews and Dublin. The article is based on accounts from Scotland and Ireland which shed light on the developments in both countries and on Historia nouorum in Anglia ‘History of recent events in England’ by Eadmer, who was biographer and confidant of Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 until his death in 1109. Eadmer was the principal contemporary first-hand witness to events in this period, but his evidence is somewhat problematic. There are few substantial comparative discussions of Scottish and Irish ecclesiastical developments in the 1120s; in addition, the work of Eadmer needs fuller consideration regarding Canterbury's relationships with Gaelic churches. Eadmer's depiction of the St. Andrews situation is especially significant because he himself was the bishop-elect. I assess how these crises arose and how they caused the relationships between Gaelic churches and Canterbury to become highly strained. I aim to show that leaders in Scotland and Ireland undertook the pursuit of ecclesiastical independence in very different ways and that both failed appointments, though eventually prompting a degree of independence, resulted in short-term stagnation.","PeriodicalId":160851,"journal":{"name":"North American journal of Celtic studies","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American journal of Celtic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26818/nortamerceltstud.2.2.0155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article investigates two comparable crises of leadership in Gaelic Christendom which occurred around the same time, in 1120–1121; these culminated in failed episcopal appointments for St. Andrews and Dublin. The article is based on accounts from Scotland and Ireland which shed light on the developments in both countries and on Historia nouorum in Anglia ‘History of recent events in England’ by Eadmer, who was biographer and confidant of Anselm, archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 until his death in 1109. Eadmer was the principal contemporary first-hand witness to events in this period, but his evidence is somewhat problematic. There are few substantial comparative discussions of Scottish and Irish ecclesiastical developments in the 1120s; in addition, the work of Eadmer needs fuller consideration regarding Canterbury's relationships with Gaelic churches. Eadmer's depiction of the St. Andrews situation is especially significant because he himself was the bishop-elect. I assess how these crises arose and how they caused the relationships between Gaelic churches and Canterbury to become highly strained. I aim to show that leaders in Scotland and Ireland undertook the pursuit of ecclesiastical independence in very different ways and that both failed appointments, though eventually prompting a degree of independence, resulted in short-term stagnation.
1120年代早期,苏格兰和爱尔兰的圣职争议和对教会独立的追求
摘要:本文考察了发生在同一时期(1120-1121年)的两次可比较的盖尔基督教领导危机;最终导致圣安德鲁斯和都柏林的主教任命失败。这篇文章是基于来自苏格兰和爱尔兰的描述,这些描述揭示了这两个国家的发展,以及由Eadmer撰写的Anglia nouorum的“英格兰近期事件的历史”,Eadmer是坎特伯雷大主教Anselm的传记作者和知己,从1093年到1109年去世。Eadmer是这一时期事件的主要当代第一手证人,但他的证据有些问题。关于1120年代苏格兰和爱尔兰教会发展的比较讨论很少;此外,对于坎特伯雷与盖尔教会的关系,埃德默的作品需要更充分的考虑。埃德默对圣安德鲁斯情况的描述尤其重要,因为他自己就是当选主教。我评估了这些危机是如何产生的,以及它们是如何导致盖尔教会和坎特伯雷之间的关系变得高度紧张的。我想说明的是,苏格兰和爱尔兰的领导人以截然不同的方式追求教会独立,两国的任命都失败了,尽管最终推动了一定程度的独立,但都导致了短期的停滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信