If They are Taxi Drivers – What Are We? Archives and Schools

J. Hodel
{"title":"If They are Taxi Drivers – What Are We? Archives and Schools","authors":"J. Hodel","doi":"10.1515/9783110466133-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It may sound strange that this contribution deals with taxis and their drivers. What do taxi drivers have to do with Public History? Actually, they have much more to do with it than one might see at a first glance, once we enter the world of metaphorical equivalents. The idea for this text stems from reading a tweet that was posted by Jessamy Carlson.1 She works at the National Archives in London and posted the following tweet during the British Archives & Records Association conference in 2011: “Archivists must be the taxi drivers of knowledge, directing people to interesting and innovative places they might like to see.”2 As soon as we enter the field of metaphors, many questions arise. In this particular case, the most pressing for my situation was: If they – the archivists – conceive themselves as taxi drivers of historical knowledge who take people to places of historical interest (to paraphrase Carlson) – then what are we history educators? Are we bus drivers who get groups of people (i.e., students) on a tight schedule (i.e., timetable) to places where they more or less want to be, but that are held important and interesting by the management of the bus company (i.e., ministerial curriculum authors)? Or are we taxi drivers as well? And if so, do we belong to a competing company – or to the same one? What would represent the traffic system in this case? And, after all, do both sides see this metaphorical situation in the same way? Of course, using metaphors takes us only so far. You easily can get lost – and not in a metaphorical way, even though you might have experienced getting lost with taxis and busses as well. So let’s stop using metaphors for now and get into the matter more thoroughly: What are the following considerations about? The first question is: Why are archives engaging in history education? And what for? This leads inevitably to the underlying question: Why should this selfconception of archivists as taxi drivers of knowledge, presented by a British archivist in a tweet, be of any concern to Public History, to history education, and to history educators in the first place? We live in a free society – and should we not","PeriodicalId":130783,"journal":{"name":"Public History and School","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public History and School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110466133-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It may sound strange that this contribution deals with taxis and their drivers. What do taxi drivers have to do with Public History? Actually, they have much more to do with it than one might see at a first glance, once we enter the world of metaphorical equivalents. The idea for this text stems from reading a tweet that was posted by Jessamy Carlson.1 She works at the National Archives in London and posted the following tweet during the British Archives & Records Association conference in 2011: “Archivists must be the taxi drivers of knowledge, directing people to interesting and innovative places they might like to see.”2 As soon as we enter the field of metaphors, many questions arise. In this particular case, the most pressing for my situation was: If they – the archivists – conceive themselves as taxi drivers of historical knowledge who take people to places of historical interest (to paraphrase Carlson) – then what are we history educators? Are we bus drivers who get groups of people (i.e., students) on a tight schedule (i.e., timetable) to places where they more or less want to be, but that are held important and interesting by the management of the bus company (i.e., ministerial curriculum authors)? Or are we taxi drivers as well? And if so, do we belong to a competing company – or to the same one? What would represent the traffic system in this case? And, after all, do both sides see this metaphorical situation in the same way? Of course, using metaphors takes us only so far. You easily can get lost – and not in a metaphorical way, even though you might have experienced getting lost with taxis and busses as well. So let’s stop using metaphors for now and get into the matter more thoroughly: What are the following considerations about? The first question is: Why are archives engaging in history education? And what for? This leads inevitably to the underlying question: Why should this selfconception of archivists as taxi drivers of knowledge, presented by a British archivist in a tweet, be of any concern to Public History, to history education, and to history educators in the first place? We live in a free society – and should we not
如果他们是出租车司机,我们是什么?档案及学校
这篇文章涉及出租车及其司机,这听起来可能有些奇怪。出租车司机和公共历史有什么关系?事实上,一旦我们进入隐喻等价物的世界,它们与它的关系比我们第一眼看到的要大得多。这篇文章的灵感来源于杰西米·卡尔森(Jessamy carlson)发布的一条推特。她在伦敦国家档案馆工作,并在2011年英国档案与记录协会会议期间发布了以下推特:“档案保持者必须是知识的出租车司机,把人们带到他们可能喜欢的有趣和创新的地方。我们一进入隐喻领域,就会产生许多问题。在这种特殊情况下,对我来说最紧迫的是:如果他们——档案保持者——把自己想象成历史知识的出租车司机,把人们带到历史名胜(套用卡尔森的话)——那么我们历史教育者是什么?我们是把一群人(如学生)按照紧凑的时间表(如时间表)送到他们或多或少想去的地方,但被公共汽车公司的管理层(如部长课程作者)认为重要和有趣的公共汽车司机吗?或者我们也是出租车司机?如果是这样,我们是属于一家竞争公司,还是属于同一家公司?在这种情况下,什么代表交通系统?毕竟,双方对这种比喻的看法是一样的吗?当然,使用隐喻也就到此为止了。你很容易迷路——而且不是隐喻的方式,即使你可能也经历过出租车和公共汽车迷路的经历。因此,让我们暂时停止使用隐喻,更彻底地讨论这个问题:下面要考虑的是什么?第一个问题是:档案馆为什么要从事历史教育?为什么?这不可避免地导致了一个潜在的问题:一位英国档案保管员在推特上提出的这种档案保管员作为知识出租车司机的自我概念,为什么会首先引起公共历史、历史教育和历史教育者的关注?我们生活在一个自由的社会里——难道我们不应该吗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信