Profile of Incompatible Crossmatching Examination Results in Patients With Gel Test Method

Eni Ruwiyanti
{"title":"Profile of Incompatible Crossmatching Examination Results in Patients With Gel Test Method","authors":"Eni Ruwiyanti","doi":"10.31983/jlm.v2i1.6983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laboratory examiners before giving blood transfusions (PretransfusionTesting) is a vital part of the transfusion activity. Incompatible Crossmatching blood tests on patients is consistent if we had to crossmatching one or more of the one or all of the positive so that blood is stated compatible with the patient. The gel test method has many advantages compared to the tubulating method other than the halting factor time. The gel test procedures have also been simpler, more practical, and easier results reading done. The goal of this study to identify the output of crossmatching receipts on the geltest method of 2019 in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten, this research method using a descriptive design with a sectional cross approach. And data retrieval using secondary data. The results shows the number of inconsistencies in patients of 116 cases. As many as 57% (66) incompatible crossmatching major minor and autocontrol of 43%(50) found a type of compatible major. The conclution are that in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten found most frequently in the diagnosis of anemia 59% (69) patients. The result of incompatible minor and positive autocontrol 57% more than compatible major 43%. Incompatible crossmatching receipts per month in the high Indonesian Redcross of Klaten is in April of 27 patients or 23%.","PeriodicalId":232833,"journal":{"name":"Jaringan Laboratorium Medis","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaringan Laboratorium Medis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jlm.v2i1.6983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laboratory examiners before giving blood transfusions (PretransfusionTesting) is a vital part of the transfusion activity. Incompatible Crossmatching blood tests on patients is consistent if we had to crossmatching one or more of the one or all of the positive so that blood is stated compatible with the patient. The gel test method has many advantages compared to the tubulating method other than the halting factor time. The gel test procedures have also been simpler, more practical, and easier results reading done. The goal of this study to identify the output of crossmatching receipts on the geltest method of 2019 in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten, this research method using a descriptive design with a sectional cross approach. And data retrieval using secondary data. The results shows the number of inconsistencies in patients of 116 cases. As many as 57% (66) incompatible crossmatching major minor and autocontrol of 43%(50) found a type of compatible major. The conclution are that in Indonesian Redcross of Klaten found most frequently in the diagnosis of anemia 59% (69) patients. The result of incompatible minor and positive autocontrol 57% more than compatible major 43%. Incompatible crossmatching receipts per month in the high Indonesian Redcross of Klaten is in April of 27 patients or 23%.
凝胶试验法患者不相容交叉配型检查结果分析
输血前的实验室检查(输血前检测)是输血活动的重要组成部分。不相容的交叉配型血液测试是一致的,如果我们必须交叉配型一个或多个阳性的一个或所有,这样血液就被声明为与患者相容。除了停止因子时间外,凝胶试验方法与管状法相比具有许多优点。凝胶测试程序也更简单,更实用,更容易的结果读取完成。本研究的目的是确定印尼红十字会2019年geltest方法上交叉匹配收据的输出,本研究方法采用描述性设计与截面交叉方法。并使用辅助数据进行数据检索。结果显示了116例患者中不一致的数量。多达57%(66人)的不兼容交叉匹配的专业和43%(50人)的自动控制找到了一种兼容的专业。结论是,在印尼红十字会诊断中最常发现克拉森贫血的患者占59%(69例)。副科与阳性自动控制结果不相容57%,副科与阳性自动控制结果不相容43%。4月份,印尼红十字会每月有27名患者或23%的患者接受不匹配的交叉配型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信