{"title":"Transcendental Analysis of Mathematics: The Transcendental Constructivism (Pragmatism) as the Program of Foundation of Mathematics","authors":"S. Katrechko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2676626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kant's transcendental philosophy (transcendentalism) is associated with the study and substantiation of objective validity both “a human mode of cognition” as whole, and specific kinds of our cognition (resp. knowledge) [KrV, B 25]. This article is devoted to Kant’s theory of the construction of mathematical concepts and his understanding (substantiation) of mathematics as cognition “through construction of concepts in intuition” [KrV, B 752] (see also: “to construct a concept means to exhibit a priori the intuition corresponding to it”; [KrV, Â 741]). Unlike the natural sciences the mathematics is an abstract – formal cognition (knowledge), its thoroughness “is grounded on definitions, axioms, and demonstrations” [KrV, B 754]. The article consequently analyzes each of these components. Mathematical objects, unlike the specific ‘physical’ objects, have an abstract character (a–objects vs. the–objects) and they are determined by Hume’s principle (Hume – Frege principle of abstraction). Transcendentalism considers the question of genesis and ontological status of mathematical concepts. To solve them Kant suggests the doctrine of schematism (Kant’s schemata are “acts of pure thought\" [KrV, B 81]), which is compared with the contemporary theories of mathematics. We develop the dating back to Kant original concept of the transcendental constructivism (pragmatism) as the as the program of foundation of mathematics. “Constructive” understanding of mathematical acts is a significant innovation of Kant. Thus mathematical activity is considered as a two-level system, which supposes a “descent” from the level of rational under-standing to the level of sensual contemplation and a return “rise”. In his theory Kant highlights ostensive (geometric) and symbolic (algebraic) constructing. The article analyses each of them and shows that it is applicable to modern mathematics, in activity of which both types of Kant's constructing are intertwined","PeriodicalId":166081,"journal":{"name":"CSN: Mathematics (Topic)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CSN: Mathematics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Kant's transcendental philosophy (transcendentalism) is associated with the study and substantiation of objective validity both “a human mode of cognition” as whole, and specific kinds of our cognition (resp. knowledge) [KrV, B 25]. This article is devoted to Kant’s theory of the construction of mathematical concepts and his understanding (substantiation) of mathematics as cognition “through construction of concepts in intuition” [KrV, B 752] (see also: “to construct a concept means to exhibit a priori the intuition corresponding to it”; [KrV, Â 741]). Unlike the natural sciences the mathematics is an abstract – formal cognition (knowledge), its thoroughness “is grounded on definitions, axioms, and demonstrations” [KrV, B 754]. The article consequently analyzes each of these components. Mathematical objects, unlike the specific ‘physical’ objects, have an abstract character (a–objects vs. the–objects) and they are determined by Hume’s principle (Hume – Frege principle of abstraction). Transcendentalism considers the question of genesis and ontological status of mathematical concepts. To solve them Kant suggests the doctrine of schematism (Kant’s schemata are “acts of pure thought" [KrV, B 81]), which is compared with the contemporary theories of mathematics. We develop the dating back to Kant original concept of the transcendental constructivism (pragmatism) as the as the program of foundation of mathematics. “Constructive” understanding of mathematical acts is a significant innovation of Kant. Thus mathematical activity is considered as a two-level system, which supposes a “descent” from the level of rational under-standing to the level of sensual contemplation and a return “rise”. In his theory Kant highlights ostensive (geometric) and symbolic (algebraic) constructing. The article analyses each of them and shows that it is applicable to modern mathematics, in activity of which both types of Kant's constructing are intertwined
康德的先验哲学(先验主义)与客观有效性的研究和证实有关,既包括整体的“一种人类的认知方式”,也包括我们的特定的认知方式(见第2章)。知识)[KrV, B 25]。本文致力于探讨康德关于数学概念建构的理论,以及他对数学作为“通过概念在直觉中的建构”的认知的理解(实证化)[KrV, B 752](另见:“建构一个概念意味着先验地展示与之相对应的直觉”;[KrV, Â 741])。与自然科学不同,数学是一种抽象的形式认知(知识),它的彻彻性“建立在定义、公理和论证的基础上”[KrV, B 754]。因此,本文将分析每一个组成部分。数学对象与具体的“物理”对象不同,具有抽象的特征(a-objects vs - the - objects),它们是由休谟原则(休谟-弗雷格抽象原则)决定的。先验主义考虑数学概念的起源和本体论地位问题。为了解决这些问题,康德提出了模式主义学说(康德的模式是“纯粹思维的行为”[KrV, B 81]),并将其与当代数学理论进行了比较。我们发展了可以追溯到康德原始概念的先验建构主义(实用主义)作为数学基础的纲领。对数学行为的“建设性”理解是康德的一项重大创新。因此,数学活动被认为是一个两级系统,它假设从理性理解的水平“下降”到感性沉思的水平,并返回“上升”。在他的理论中,康德强调了明示(几何)和象征(代数)的建构。本文分析了这两种类型,并指出它适用于现代数学,在现代数学的活动中,这两种类型的康德建构是交织在一起的