Social Protection and Growth

Román Arjona, Maxime Ladaique, M. Pearson
{"title":"Social Protection and Growth","authors":"Román Arjona, Maxime Ladaique, M. Pearson","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2002-ART8-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public social expenditure accounts for 25 per cent of GDP, or even more in some countries. That expenditure on this scale has some effect on growth seems very likely, but the direction of the effect is disputed by different schools of thought. Using new data sources and panel data econometric techniques, this paper sheds new light on the issue. Evidence is found in favour of the proposition that more social expenditure reduces growth. However, “active” social spending, including active labour market policies, make work pay policies and spending on family services, appears to have the opposite effect and may be growth-enhancing.","PeriodicalId":257911,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Economic Studies","volume":"2002 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2002-ART8-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

Abstract

Public social expenditure accounts for 25 per cent of GDP, or even more in some countries. That expenditure on this scale has some effect on growth seems very likely, but the direction of the effect is disputed by different schools of thought. Using new data sources and panel data econometric techniques, this paper sheds new light on the issue. Evidence is found in favour of the proposition that more social expenditure reduces growth. However, “active” social spending, including active labour market policies, make work pay policies and spending on family services, appears to have the opposite effect and may be growth-enhancing.
社会保障与增长
公共社会支出占国内生产总值的25%,在某些国家甚至更多。这种规模的支出对经济增长有一定的影响似乎是很有可能的,但这种影响的方向却受到不同思想流派的争议。本文利用新的数据来源和面板数据计量经济学技术,对这一问题进行了新的阐述。有证据表明,更多的社会支出会降低增长。然而,“积极的”社会支出,包括积极的劳动力市场政策、劳动报酬政策和家庭服务支出,似乎具有相反的效果,可能会促进增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信