Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator

S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert
{"title":"Vessel wall tracking based on the modified autocorrelation estimator","authors":"S. Inge Rabben, P. Segers, J. De Backer, J. De Sutter, P. Verdonck, T. Gillebert","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.","PeriodicalId":378705,"journal":{"name":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2002 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2002.1192645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In 16 subjects (age 26-74) we recorded radio-frequency (RF) data of the Carotid artery with a Vivid7 scanner (GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) and Carotid diameters with WallTrack (Pie Medical, Maastricht, The Netherlands). The RF data were stored as complex demodulated radio-frequency data (IQ data) and transferred to a PC for estimation of diameter curves. For the prototype system, diameter curves are derived using a modified autocorrelation method, in contrast to Walltrack where the complex cross-correlation method is applied. For all datasets, 2-5 beats were averaged to calculate representative one-cycle curves. The diameter distension /spl Delta/D as obtained with both systems was in the range 0.27-0.71 mm, and was highly correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03) with a mean difference of -0.03 mm and limits of agreement (mean difference /spl plusmn/ 2*SD of the differences) of -0.15-0.09 mm. The relative distension /spl Delta/D/D ranged from 3.5 to 11.1% and had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75). The mean difference of /spl Delta/D/D was -0.4%, and the limits of agreement were -2.2-1.4%. In conclusion, this study indicates that it is adequate to use the modified autocorrelation method for vessel wall tracking.
基于改进自相关估计的血管壁跟踪
在16名受试者(年龄26-74岁)中,我们使用了一台成像仪(挪威Horten的GE Vingmed超声)记录了颈动脉的射频(RF)数据,并使用WallTrack记录了颈动脉的直径(Pie Medical,荷兰马斯特里赫特)。射频数据以复杂解调射频数据(IQ数据)的形式存储,并传输到PC机中用于估计直径曲线。对于原型系统,采用一种改进的自相关方法推导出直径曲线,而不是采用复互相关方法。对于所有数据集,取2-5次心跳的平均值,以计算具有代表性的单周期曲线。两种系统测得的直径膨胀/spl δ /D在0.27 ~ 0.71 mm范围内,与平均差值-0.03 mm高度相关(r = 0.91, p < 0.002, y = 0.99x + 0.03),一致性限为-0.15 ~ 0.09 mm(平均差值/spl + usmn/ 2*SD差值)。相对扩张/spl δ /D/D范围为3.5 ~ 11.1%,相关系数r = 0.92 (p < 0.002, y = 0.94x + 0.75)。/spl Delta/D/D的平均差值为-0.4%,一致性限为-2.2 ~ 1.4%。综上所述,本研究表明,采用改进的自相关方法进行血管壁跟踪是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信