Oregon's Senate Joint Resolution 12: Understanding the Implications of a Constitutional Right to Healthcare

Anna Starr
{"title":"Oregon's Senate Joint Resolution 12: Understanding the Implications of a Constitutional Right to Healthcare","authors":"Anna Starr","doi":"10.15760/hgjpa.2021.6.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problems persist throughout the U.S. healthcare system including exorbitant costs, poor health scores, high rates of uninsured, and lack of access to services among marginalized groups. Among many proposed solutions is a constitutional provision to healthcare. Largely based in ethics, healthcare as a right is also expected by many to improve health outcomes. However, while constitutional provisions for healthcare are found in countries around the world, empirical research results are limited and mixed at best. In the wake of social justice movements and resurgence of vibrant conversations about human rights, and with international pressure mounting for the U.S. to follow suit, it is an important issue for Americans. While amending the federal constitution remains daunting and unlikely, states can amend their own constitutions. In November 2022, Oregonians will vote to amendment the Oregon constitution making healthcare a human right under Senate Joint Resolution 12, previously “the Hope Amendment.” This paper strives to provide a well-balanced understanding of its potential aftereffects and a brief examination of its aspirational influence on health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":123243,"journal":{"name":"Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/hgjpa.2021.6.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problems persist throughout the U.S. healthcare system including exorbitant costs, poor health scores, high rates of uninsured, and lack of access to services among marginalized groups. Among many proposed solutions is a constitutional provision to healthcare. Largely based in ethics, healthcare as a right is also expected by many to improve health outcomes. However, while constitutional provisions for healthcare are found in countries around the world, empirical research results are limited and mixed at best. In the wake of social justice movements and resurgence of vibrant conversations about human rights, and with international pressure mounting for the U.S. to follow suit, it is an important issue for Americans. While amending the federal constitution remains daunting and unlikely, states can amend their own constitutions. In November 2022, Oregonians will vote to amendment the Oregon constitution making healthcare a human right under Senate Joint Resolution 12, previously “the Hope Amendment.” This paper strives to provide a well-balanced understanding of its potential aftereffects and a brief examination of its aspirational influence on health outcomes.
俄勒冈州参议院第12号联合决议:理解宪法赋予医疗保健权利的含义
美国医疗保健系统的问题一直存在,包括高昂的费用、糟糕的健康评分、高未参保率以及边缘化群体缺乏获得服务的机会。在众多提议的解决方案中,有一项是针对医疗保健的宪法条款。医疗保健作为一项权利,在很大程度上以道德为基础,许多人也期望它能改善健康结果。然而,虽然世界各国都有关于医疗保健的宪法规定,但实证研究结果有限,而且充其量是混杂的。随着社会正义运动和关于人权的活跃对话的复苏,以及要求美国效仿的国际压力的增加,这对美国人来说是一个重要的问题。虽然修改联邦宪法仍然是艰巨和不可能的,但各州可以修改自己的宪法。2022年11月,俄勒冈人将投票修改俄勒冈宪法,根据参议院联合决议12,即以前的“希望修正案”,使医疗保健成为一项人权。本文力求对其潜在的后遗症提供一个平衡的理解,并简要审查其对健康结果的期望影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信