Interface Risk Reduction in an Integrated SURF-SPS Scope Execution

Abstract

The paper provides a detailed estimation of the interfaces that exist in a split SURF-SPS execution model and provides a qualitative comparison to an integrated SURF-SPS execution model. A comprehensive matrix of dependencies between SURF and SPS is presented and is categorized into engineering, procurement, construction/fabrication and installation work packages. The matrix is used to illustrate the exact scope dependencies and thus, the sources of interfaces. A hypothetical greenfield development has been assumed to develop the interface matrix and to use it for comparison of the two execution models. The comparison also reveals how interfaces are naturally eliminated in an integrated SURF-SPS execution model. In each of the workstreams (E-P-C-I), top risks have been identified and monetary liability estimates for those risks have been provided. By transfer of these risks from company to contractor, monetary liability gets transferred to the contractor, thus, resulting in significant savings for operating companies. The following tangible results are provided in the paper: a) % of interface(s) reduced in the E-P-C-I areas; b) Risk reduction in monetary terms for operators – estimated values. This paper justifies the fact that there is a significant interface scope and risk reduction for operators, if they adopt an integrated SURF-SPS execution model.