From the Periphery to the Center of Global Knowledge Production? A Bibliometric Analysis of the Evolution of a Social Science Community From a Small Country: Austria

Arno Tausch
{"title":"From the Periphery to the Center of Global Knowledge Production? A Bibliometric Analysis of the Evolution of a Social Science Community From a Small Country: Austria","authors":"Arno Tausch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3475609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<br>This bibliometric analysis of the global presence of Austrian political science (104 senior political scientists) is based on Scopus and OCLC Worldcat. Our global market presence indicators are:<br><br>• The number of articles indexed in Scopus<br>• The total number of quotations documented in Scopus<br>• The H-Index according to Scopus<br>• OCLC Worldcat: book with the largest global library presence<br>• OCLC Worldcat: book with the second largest global library presence<br>• OCLC Worldcat: book with the third largest global library presence<br><br>We also presented the results of a promax factor analysis of our data. We provide rankings of the global presence of Austrian political science according to the criteria used in this article. <br><br>There is ample evidence of a successful publication strategy based on the international journals, indexed in Scopus and the diffusion of book titles in the global libraries, contained in the OCLC Worldcat by a significant proportion of the Austrian political science community. We introduce some measures of comparison of their performance with the German, Swiss, and American political science communities.<br><br>Data from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge support our contentions, also over the time period 1970-2019.<br><br>Arguments against an international publication strategy, citing the global science enterprise as an international mode of power, are utterly wrong. We show that the relationship of the often invoked “critical” political science and “mainstream publishing” can be a positive one, discussing the example of current political transformations in Portugal, one of the few cases of a successful political left-wing project in Europe. There is no alternative to mainstream scientific publishing with major international journal and book publishers. Finally, we suggest that publishing with journals and book companies from emerging centers of publishing like the BRICS countries and in Eastern Europe can be also an attractive path for Austrian political science and for similar social science communities in the future. <br>","PeriodicalId":422077,"journal":{"name":"Political Anthropology eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3475609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract


This bibliometric analysis of the global presence of Austrian political science (104 senior political scientists) is based on Scopus and OCLC Worldcat. Our global market presence indicators are:

• The number of articles indexed in Scopus
• The total number of quotations documented in Scopus
• The H-Index according to Scopus
• OCLC Worldcat: book with the largest global library presence
• OCLC Worldcat: book with the second largest global library presence
• OCLC Worldcat: book with the third largest global library presence

We also presented the results of a promax factor analysis of our data. We provide rankings of the global presence of Austrian political science according to the criteria used in this article.

There is ample evidence of a successful publication strategy based on the international journals, indexed in Scopus and the diffusion of book titles in the global libraries, contained in the OCLC Worldcat by a significant proportion of the Austrian political science community. We introduce some measures of comparison of their performance with the German, Swiss, and American political science communities.

Data from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge support our contentions, also over the time period 1970-2019.

Arguments against an international publication strategy, citing the global science enterprise as an international mode of power, are utterly wrong. We show that the relationship of the often invoked “critical” political science and “mainstream publishing” can be a positive one, discussing the example of current political transformations in Portugal, one of the few cases of a successful political left-wing project in Europe. There is no alternative to mainstream scientific publishing with major international journal and book publishers. Finally, we suggest that publishing with journals and book companies from emerging centers of publishing like the BRICS countries and in Eastern Europe can be also an attractive path for Austrian political science and for similar social science communities in the future.
从全球知识生产的边缘到中心?小国社会科学共同体演变的文献计量学分析:奥地利
这份文献计量学分析是基于Scopus和OCLC Worldcat对全球奥地利政治学(104名高级政治科学家)的研究。我们的全球市场占有率指标是:•在Scopus中索引的文章数量•在Scopus中记录的引文总数•根据Scopus得出的h指数•OCLC Worldcat:全球图书馆数量最多的图书•OCLC Worldcat:全球图书馆数量第二多的图书•OCLC Worldcat:全球图书馆数量第三多的图书我们还展示了对我们的数据进行最大因子分析的结果。我们根据本文中使用的标准对奥地利政治学的全球存在进行排名。有充分的证据表明,一个成功的出版策略是基于国际期刊,在Scopus中索引,在全球图书馆中传播书名,在OCLC Worldcat中包含了奥地利政治学社区的很大一部分。我们介绍了一些与德国、瑞士和美国政治科学界的表现进行比较的措施。来自科睿唯安分析知识网的数据也支持了我们的观点,这些数据也涵盖了1970年至2019年的时间段。反对国际出版战略的论点,将全球科学事业作为一种国际力量模式,是完全错误的。我们展示了经常被引用的“批判”政治学和“主流出版”的关系可以是积极的,讨论了葡萄牙当前政治转型的例子,这是欧洲少数几个成功的政治左翼项目之一。除了国际主要期刊和图书出版商的主流科学出版之外,没有其他选择。最后,我们建议,与金砖国家和东欧等新兴出版中心的期刊和图书公司合作出版,对奥地利政治学和类似的社会科学界来说,未来也是一条有吸引力的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信