Staff councils in hospitals as co-managers? A blind spot in codetermination research

S. Bär, S. Starystach, Heike Hess
{"title":"Staff councils in hospitals as co-managers? A blind spot in codetermination research","authors":"S. Bär, S. Starystach, Heike Hess","doi":"10.3224/indbez.v28i4.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Public Management (NPM) has triggered far-reaching transformations within hospital sectors worldwide and professionalized hospital management has put employee representation under pressure. In this context the current state of research points out that codetermination actors are taking increasingly over the role of co-managers. To test this hypothesis, the cognitive and normative structures in the mind-sets of staff council members at four German university hospitals have been reconstructed on the bases of problem-centered interviews. The results show that the structural change in the German hospital sector affects employee representation in university clinics extensively. However, there is no clear-cut development towards a co-management orientation within the mind-sets of the staff council members. On the contrary, co-management is rejected in varying degrees. The reason for that being is that staff councils in German university hospitals, in addition to their institutional codetermination function, see themselves closely linked to the institutional mission of providing a public good. This is firmly embedded in the cognitive and normative structures of the mindsets. Although the study focusses on a very specific area of co-determination, it exemplifies how the political agenda of the NPM can irritate and break institutionalized patterns in industrial relations.","PeriodicalId":408151,"journal":{"name":"Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/indbez.v28i4.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New Public Management (NPM) has triggered far-reaching transformations within hospital sectors worldwide and professionalized hospital management has put employee representation under pressure. In this context the current state of research points out that codetermination actors are taking increasingly over the role of co-managers. To test this hypothesis, the cognitive and normative structures in the mind-sets of staff council members at four German university hospitals have been reconstructed on the bases of problem-centered interviews. The results show that the structural change in the German hospital sector affects employee representation in university clinics extensively. However, there is no clear-cut development towards a co-management orientation within the mind-sets of the staff council members. On the contrary, co-management is rejected in varying degrees. The reason for that being is that staff councils in German university hospitals, in addition to their institutional codetermination function, see themselves closely linked to the institutional mission of providing a public good. This is firmly embedded in the cognitive and normative structures of the mindsets. Although the study focusses on a very specific area of co-determination, it exemplifies how the political agenda of the NPM can irritate and break institutionalized patterns in industrial relations.
医院的员工委员会作为共同管理者?共测定研究中的盲点
新公共管理(NPM)在世界范围内的医院部门引发了深远的变革,专业化的医院管理使员工代表面临压力。在这种情况下,目前的研究表明,共同决定行为者正在越来越多地取代共同管理者的角色。为了验证这一假设,在以问题为中心的访谈的基础上,对德国四所大学医院的员工委员会成员的思维模式中的认知和规范结构进行了重建。结果表明,在德国医院部门的结构变化影响员工代表在大学诊所广泛。但是,在工作人员理事会成员的思维方式中,没有明确的朝向共同管理方向的发展。相反,共同管理在不同程度上被拒绝。这样做的原因是,德国大学医院的工作人员理事会除了其机构共同决定职能外,还认为自己与提供公共利益的机构使命密切相关。这是牢牢地嵌入在认知和规范结构的心态。尽管该研究侧重于共同决定的一个非常具体的领域,但它举例说明了NPM的政治议程如何刺激和打破工业关系中的制度化模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信