Future Healthcare Logistics: A Survey of the Public Opinion on Drones in Denmark

I. Fasterholdt, M. Knudsen, Nicolai From, M. Frederiksen
{"title":"Future Healthcare Logistics: A Survey of the Public Opinion on Drones in Denmark","authors":"I. Fasterholdt, M. Knudsen, Nicolai From, M. Frederiksen","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2022-0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drones are expected to become widespread in society, making public readiness an important prerequisite for successfully unleashing drones. This article investigates Danish citizens’ opinions on drones across varying fields of application and, specifically, six potential cases of healthcare logistics. Survey data representative of age, gender and geography were collected and included information about respondents’ background, knowledge level of drones and opinions on different drone use cases. Data were analysed with frequency tables and bivariate cross-tabulation. 1,004 Danish adults completed the survey. Although other fields of application received higher levels of support, a majority of the respondents were positive towards using drones for healthcare logistics. Transportation of medicine and blood samples between hospitals were the most accepted healthcare use cases. Support varies across age with the highest support found in the eldest age group. Also, the more citizens report to know about drones, the more they tend to support using them. The results suggest that policymakers and firms must be attentive towards the public opinion on drones and seek insights into what citizens regard as noble purposes of using drones. Moreover, citizens must become more acquainted with drones, as this will likely boost public support.","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2022-0050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drones are expected to become widespread in society, making public readiness an important prerequisite for successfully unleashing drones. This article investigates Danish citizens’ opinions on drones across varying fields of application and, specifically, six potential cases of healthcare logistics. Survey data representative of age, gender and geography were collected and included information about respondents’ background, knowledge level of drones and opinions on different drone use cases. Data were analysed with frequency tables and bivariate cross-tabulation. 1,004 Danish adults completed the survey. Although other fields of application received higher levels of support, a majority of the respondents were positive towards using drones for healthcare logistics. Transportation of medicine and blood samples between hospitals were the most accepted healthcare use cases. Support varies across age with the highest support found in the eldest age group. Also, the more citizens report to know about drones, the more they tend to support using them. The results suggest that policymakers and firms must be attentive towards the public opinion on drones and seek insights into what citizens regard as noble purposes of using drones. Moreover, citizens must become more acquainted with drones, as this will likely boost public support.
未来医疗物流:丹麦公众对无人机的意见调查
无人机有望在社会上普及,公众准备就绪是成功放飞无人机的重要先决条件。本文调查了丹麦公民对不同应用领域的无人机的看法,特别是医疗保健物流的六个潜在案例。收集了具有年龄、性别和地域代表性的调查数据,包括受访者的背景信息、无人机知识水平以及对不同无人机用例的看法。数据分析采用频率表和双变量交叉表。1004名丹麦成年人完成了这项调查。尽管其他应用领域得到了更高水平的支持,但大多数受访者对将无人机用于医疗保健物流持积极态度。在医院之间运输药品和血液样本是最被接受的医疗保健用例。支持度因年龄而异,最大年龄组的支持度最高。此外,公民对无人机的了解越多,他们就越倾向于支持使用无人机。研究结果表明,决策者和企业必须关注公众对无人机的看法,并深入了解公民认为使用无人机的崇高目的是什么。此外,公民必须更加熟悉无人机,因为这可能会提高公众的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信