Uterine artery hemodynamic changes due to a Cervical Traction maneuver (Amr’s maneuver); Randomized Controlled Study

A. Nada, Emad R. Issak, Khaled M. Kholaif, H. Torkey, I. Fawzy, Reham A. Mohsen
{"title":"Uterine artery hemodynamic changes due to a Cervical Traction maneuver (Amr’s maneuver); Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"A. Nada, Emad R. Issak, Khaled M. Kholaif, H. Torkey, I. Fawzy, Reham A. Mohsen","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17714.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To measure the impacts of cervical traction on the uterine artery hemodynamics.Methods: This study was a randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the uterine artery hemodynamics indices: end diastolic velocity (EDV) and systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D ratio).Main Results: The study was conducted in one institution in Cairo from January-2017 to March-2017 with 12-month follow up period. Both groups were comparable (p-value > 0.05) with regard to the age, BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, gravidity, parity as well as episiotomy. There was no difference (P> 0.05) between the two groups regarding vital signs after the intervention. All the patients tolerated the procedure with mild sedation. PSV, EDV, S/D, PI & RI were comparable between both groups before the intervention. However, PSV, S/D ratio, RI & PI were significantly higher (p-values < 0.001) in the study group than the control group after the intervention. On the other hand, EDV was significantly lower in the study group than the control group after the intervention (p-value < 0.001). During the follow-up period, no adverse events reported.Conclusion: Amr’s maneuver is effective in changing the uterine artery hemodynamics indices in the direction of decreasing the uterine artery blood flow.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17714.1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To measure the impacts of cervical traction on the uterine artery hemodynamics.Methods: This study was a randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the uterine artery hemodynamics indices: end diastolic velocity (EDV) and systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D ratio).Main Results: The study was conducted in one institution in Cairo from January-2017 to March-2017 with 12-month follow up period. Both groups were comparable (p-value > 0.05) with regard to the age, BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, gravidity, parity as well as episiotomy. There was no difference (P> 0.05) between the two groups regarding vital signs after the intervention. All the patients tolerated the procedure with mild sedation. PSV, EDV, S/D, PI & RI were comparable between both groups before the intervention. However, PSV, S/D ratio, RI & PI were significantly higher (p-values < 0.001) in the study group than the control group after the intervention. On the other hand, EDV was significantly lower in the study group than the control group after the intervention (p-value < 0.001). During the follow-up period, no adverse events reported.Conclusion: Amr’s maneuver is effective in changing the uterine artery hemodynamics indices in the direction of decreasing the uterine artery blood flow.
宫颈牵引术对子宫动脉血流动力学的影响随机对照研究
目的:观察宫颈牵引对子宫动脉血流动力学的影响。方法:采用随机对照试验。主要观察指标为子宫动脉血流动力学指标:舒张末期速度(EDV)和收缩/舒张速度比(S/D ratio)。主要结果:研究于2017年1月至2017年3月在开罗的一家机构进行,随访期为12个月。两组在年龄、BMI、心率、血压、妊娠、胎次及会阴切开术方面均具有可比性(p值> 0.05)。干预后两组患者生命体征差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。所有患者在轻度镇静的情况下都能耐受手术。干预前两组间PSV、EDV、S/D、PI和RI具有可比性。干预后,研究组的PSV、S/D比、RI、PI均显著高于对照组(p值< 0.001)。另一方面,干预后研究组的EDV显著低于对照组(p值< 0.001)。在随访期间,无不良事件报告。结论:Amr手法可使子宫动脉血流动力学指标朝着减少子宫动脉血流的方向改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信