Evaluating the Optimal Self-Checking Carry Propagate Adder for Cryptographic Processor

M.A. Akbar, Bo Wang, A. Bermak
{"title":"Evaluating the Optimal Self-Checking Carry Propagate Adder for Cryptographic Processor","authors":"M.A. Akbar, Bo Wang, A. Bermak","doi":"10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing number of invasive attacks, cryptographic processors are becoming more susceptible to failure. Therefore, the desire for reliable hardware is becoming increasingly important. Since an adder is a vital component in the hardware design of cryptographic protocols, a reliable adder can significantly improve the vulnerability against invasive attacks. Adders with different architectures have already been widely studied and analyzed and appropriate types have been proposed based on the application. This paper considers the design of adder most suitable for reliable cryptographic operation and investigates the optimal self-checking carry propagate adder design offering the best possible performance in terms of latency, delay, and area. In terms of area versus delay, the self-checking parallel ripple carry adder (PRCA) with 23.4% area overhead as compared to the self-checking ripple carry adder (RCA) provides a delay efficiency of 70.31%. However, the area-delay product for 64-bit self-checking designs showed that the hybrid adder is 71.2%, 21.4%, and 37.9% more efficient than the RCA, PRCA and carry look-ahead adder design, respectively.","PeriodicalId":150801,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing number of invasive attacks, cryptographic processors are becoming more susceptible to failure. Therefore, the desire for reliable hardware is becoming increasingly important. Since an adder is a vital component in the hardware design of cryptographic protocols, a reliable adder can significantly improve the vulnerability against invasive attacks. Adders with different architectures have already been widely studied and analyzed and appropriate types have been proposed based on the application. This paper considers the design of adder most suitable for reliable cryptographic operation and investigates the optimal self-checking carry propagate adder design offering the best possible performance in terms of latency, delay, and area. In terms of area versus delay, the self-checking parallel ripple carry adder (PRCA) with 23.4% area overhead as compared to the self-checking ripple carry adder (RCA) provides a delay efficiency of 70.31%. However, the area-delay product for 64-bit self-checking designs showed that the hybrid adder is 71.2%, 21.4%, and 37.9% more efficient than the RCA, PRCA and carry look-ahead adder design, respectively.
加密处理器中最优进位传播加法器的评估
随着侵入性攻击的增加,加密处理器变得越来越容易出错。因此,对可靠硬件的需求变得越来越重要。由于加法器是加密协议硬件设计中的重要组成部分,因此可靠的加法器可以显著提高加密协议抵御入侵攻击的脆弱性。对不同结构的加法器进行了广泛的研究和分析,并根据应用提出了合适的加法器类型。本文考虑了最适合可靠密码操作的加法器设计,并研究了在延迟、延迟和面积方面提供最佳性能的最优自检进位传播加法器设计。在面积与延迟方面,与自检纹波进位加法器(RCA)相比,自检并行纹波进位加法器(PRCA)的面积开销为23.4%,延迟效率为70.31%。然而,64位自检设计的面积延迟产品表明,混合加法器的效率分别比RCA、PRCA和进位前视加法器设计高71.2%、21.4%和37.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信