On the Dynamics of Narratives of Crisis during Terror Attacks

Lisa Grobelscheg, Karolina Śliwa, Ema Kusen, Mark Strembeck
{"title":"On the Dynamics of Narratives of Crisis during Terror Attacks","authors":"Lisa Grobelscheg, Karolina Śliwa, Ema Kusen, Mark Strembeck","doi":"10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an analysis of the narratives that emerged on Twitter during four different terror attacks. To this end, we analyze a data-set consisting of more than five million Twitter messages. We use the structural topic model (STM) approach to automatically detect six narratives of crisis. Our findings indicate that i) Twitter users are highly engaged in the dissemination of operational and memorial narratives, ii) emotions and narratives directed towards authority accounts dominate the discourse regarding the entire event, iii) the presence of positive authority nodes (i.e. authority nodes who are predominantly perceived as being positive) directly impacts the type of a discourse and fuels hopeful memorial narratives to a larger extent than accusations and blaming.","PeriodicalId":371668,"journal":{"name":"2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Ninth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAMS58071.2022.10062580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present an analysis of the narratives that emerged on Twitter during four different terror attacks. To this end, we analyze a data-set consisting of more than five million Twitter messages. We use the structural topic model (STM) approach to automatically detect six narratives of crisis. Our findings indicate that i) Twitter users are highly engaged in the dissemination of operational and memorial narratives, ii) emotions and narratives directed towards authority accounts dominate the discourse regarding the entire event, iii) the presence of positive authority nodes (i.e. authority nodes who are predominantly perceived as being positive) directly impacts the type of a discourse and fuels hopeful memorial narratives to a larger extent than accusations and blaming.
论恐怖袭击中危机叙事的动态
我们对四次不同的恐怖袭击期间出现在Twitter上的叙述进行了分析。为此,我们分析了一个由500多万条Twitter消息组成的数据集。我们使用结构主题模型(STM)方法自动检测六种危机叙事。我们的研究结果表明,i) Twitter用户高度参与了操作性和纪念性叙事的传播,ii)针对权威账户的情绪和叙事主导了整个事件的话语,iii)积极权威节点(即主要被认为是积极的权威节点)的存在直接影响了话语的类型,并在更大程度上激发了充满希望的纪念叙事,而不是指责和指责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信