Debt, usury and the ongoing crises of capitalism

N. Gane
{"title":"Debt, usury and the ongoing crises of capitalism","authors":"N. Gane","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvggx2fq.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses a concept that was once central to debates within classical liberal thought but today is largely neglected: usury. The question of usury divided classical liberals over whether there should be a free market in the provision of credit or rather government policing of the social and moral limits of debt. These divisions resurface in a contemporary the current post-crisis period in debate over whether the short-term loan market should be free to meet the demands of credit supply (the libertarian position) or should be regulated by government agencies to ensure that it works within limits (a neoliberal stance). This chapter argues that the concept of usury is useful for questioning the role of state and government in regulating private debt, and for considering the possibility of an alternative politics of debt that centres not on regulating the rate of interest charged on credit, but rather the freedom of banks and other institutions to lend money at a price.","PeriodicalId":357157,"journal":{"name":"The sociology of debt","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The sociology of debt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvggx2fq.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter addresses a concept that was once central to debates within classical liberal thought but today is largely neglected: usury. The question of usury divided classical liberals over whether there should be a free market in the provision of credit or rather government policing of the social and moral limits of debt. These divisions resurface in a contemporary the current post-crisis period in debate over whether the short-term loan market should be free to meet the demands of credit supply (the libertarian position) or should be regulated by government agencies to ensure that it works within limits (a neoliberal stance). This chapter argues that the concept of usury is useful for questioning the role of state and government in regulating private debt, and for considering the possibility of an alternative politics of debt that centres not on regulating the rate of interest charged on credit, but rather the freedom of banks and other institutions to lend money at a price.
债务、高利贷和持续不断的资本主义危机
本章讨论了一个概念,这个概念曾经是古典自由主义思想辩论的核心,但今天在很大程度上被忽视了:高利贷。在高利贷问题上,古典自由主义者就是否应该在信贷供应方面建立自由市场,还是应该由政府监管债务的社会和道德限度,产生了分歧。这些分歧在当前的后危机时期重新出现,争论的焦点是短期贷款市场是否应该自由地满足信贷供应的需求(自由主义立场),还是应该由政府机构监管以确保其在限制范围内运作(新自由主义立场)。本章认为,高利贷的概念对于质疑国家和政府在监管私人债务方面的作用,以及考虑另一种债务政治的可能性是有用的,这种政治不是以监管信贷利率为中心,而是以银行和其他机构有价放贷的自由为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信