{"title":"Study on the Cross-Examination of Witnesses by Closed Circuit Television","authors":"Mariko Nakamura","doi":"10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Japan introduced a protective measure for witnesses including victims to testify by closed circuit television through the amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure in May 2000 to alleviate their psychological burden during testimony at trial. Its scope was expanded in June 2016 and is under consideration by one of the subcommittees of the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice for additional expansion at this writing in January 2023. \nCriminal defendants, on the other hand, have the right to examine all witnesses. There are discussions on whether the right is constitutionally affected by using closed circuit television. The Supreme Court of Japan ruled the then-provision constitutional in 2005 but it is necessary to carefully examine the meaning of “face-to-face confrontation” during testimony and the need to restrict the right. Therefore, this article considers what should be taken into account to allow witnesses to testify through closed circuit television with reference to Crawford v. Washington judged by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2004, which put great value on “face-to-face confrontation” in relation to the similar right as the Japanese one, and the subsequent discussions in the United States.","PeriodicalId":398961,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Japan introduced a protective measure for witnesses including victims to testify by closed circuit television through the amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure in May 2000 to alleviate their psychological burden during testimony at trial. Its scope was expanded in June 2016 and is under consideration by one of the subcommittees of the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice for additional expansion at this writing in January 2023.
Criminal defendants, on the other hand, have the right to examine all witnesses. There are discussions on whether the right is constitutionally affected by using closed circuit television. The Supreme Court of Japan ruled the then-provision constitutional in 2005 but it is necessary to carefully examine the meaning of “face-to-face confrontation” during testimony and the need to restrict the right. Therefore, this article considers what should be taken into account to allow witnesses to testify through closed circuit television with reference to Crawford v. Washington judged by the Supreme Court of the United States in 2004, which put great value on “face-to-face confrontation” in relation to the similar right as the Japanese one, and the subsequent discussions in the United States.
日本于2000年5月修订了《刑事诉讼法》,采取了一项保护措施,允许包括受害者在内的证人通过闭路电视作证,以减轻他们在审判中作证时的心理负担。其范围于2016年6月扩大,并于2023年1月由司法部立法会的一个小组委员会审议进一步扩大。另一方面,刑事被告有权询问所有证人。对于使用闭路电视是否会影响宪法上的权利,也有讨论。2005年,日本大法院对当时的规定做出了符合宪法的判决,但有必要仔细研究证词过程中“面对面对抗”的含义和限制该权利的必要性。因此,本文结合2004年美国最高法院判决的克劳福德诉华盛顿案(Crawford v. Washington)对与日本类似权利的“面对面对抗”的重视,以及随后在美国的讨论,探讨允许证人通过闭路电视作证应考虑的问题。