J. V. Van Stee, Megan Adams, Dmitry Lenkov, Raymond Obin, Henry Saade
{"title":"Status of object-oriented COBOL (panel)","authors":"J. V. Van Stee, Megan Adams, Dmitry Lenkov, Raymond Obin, Henry Saade","doi":"10.1145/260303.260318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joel Van Stee started the discussion with an introduction of the panel members and a brief history of the task group generating the extensions. The original sponsor of the group was CODASYL, the ANSI COBOL committee’s design group. When CODASYL was absorbed by the ANSI COBOL committee, X3J4, the object-oriented committee was separately organized as a subcommittee of X3J4, and is now known as X3J4.1. It exists only as long as the parent ANSI COBOL committee considers this independent effort required. The aim of the two groups is to have a single COBOL standard targeted for publication in 1997. implementer approved techniques. The initial design decisions included assuring that the large base of code would not be invalidated by the object-oriented extensions.","PeriodicalId":297156,"journal":{"name":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addendum to the proceedings on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/260303.260318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Joel Van Stee started the discussion with an introduction of the panel members and a brief history of the task group generating the extensions. The original sponsor of the group was CODASYL, the ANSI COBOL committee’s design group. When CODASYL was absorbed by the ANSI COBOL committee, X3J4, the object-oriented committee was separately organized as a subcommittee of X3J4, and is now known as X3J4.1. It exists only as long as the parent ANSI COBOL committee considers this independent effort required. The aim of the two groups is to have a single COBOL standard targeted for publication in 1997. implementer approved techniques. The initial design decisions included assuring that the large base of code would not be invalidated by the object-oriented extensions.
Joel Van Stee首先介绍了小组成员,并简要介绍了生成扩展的任务组的历史。该小组的最初发起人是CODASYL,即ANSI COBOL委员会的设计组。当CODASYL被ANSI COBOL委员会X3J4吸收时,面向对象委员会被单独组织为X3J4的一个小组委员会,现在称为X3J4.1。只有当父ANSI COBOL委员会认为这种独立的努力是必需的,它才存在。这两个小组的目标是在1997年发布一个单一的COBOL标准。实现者认可的技术。最初的设计决策包括确保大型代码库不会被面向对象的扩展失效。