Effect of using celery seed as a probiotic on the productive traits of kids local goats

Meitham K, Ali AL-Galiby, Noora. K. J. Ai-Ghazi
{"title":"Effect of using celery seed as a probiotic on the productive traits of kids local goats","authors":"Meitham K, Ali AL-Galiby, Noora. K. J. Ai-Ghazi","doi":"10.54174/utjagr.vo11.n2/24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in the animal field of the College of Agriculture and Marshes / University of Thi- Qar from 12/30/2021 to 3/15/2022 in order to find out the effect of giving celery base and probiotic to the kids of local goats and its reflection on the productive traits. This origin in the study gave 16 formulas weighing 14.5 kg, and performed randomly on a treatment with four replications for one treatment, T1 treatments: Treating the basic ration consisting of (59% barley, 37% bran, 1% urea, 2% salts, 1% vitamins) and without added, T2 (control treatment + addition of probiotic 2%), T3 (treatment of control + addition of celery seed 5%), T4 (treatment + addition of probiotic with celery). The results of the current study showed that the addition of celery seeds and the probiotic/head/day increased the rate of weight and weight gain. The results of the first week of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference in weight despite the presence of an arithmetic increase in favor of the probiotic and celery treatment, with an average of (15.89) kg compared to With the rest of the treatments, in the second week, the moral superiority was in favor of the two treatments (the probiotic + celery and celery) whose average was 16.37 and 16.54 kg, respectively, and through the results we find a significant superiority in the treatment (the probiotic + celery) for the fourth, sixth and eighth weeks And the tenth and twelfth of the experiment, and the averages recorded for their body weights were (17.300), 18.40, 19.30, 20.30, and 21.30 kg, respectively, compared to the rest of the experiment's treatments. As for the total weight gain, the moral superiority was in favor of the probiotic treatment, as it recorded an average of (7.15) kg compared to the rest of the treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, and the control), where the average total weight increases were 5.41, 5.16, 4.19) kg, respectively. Significant superiority was noted in the daily weight gain rate in favor of the probiotic treatment, as it recorded an average daily weight gain of 85.11 (gm/day) compared to the rest of the experiment treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, control) and the average daily weight gain values ​​were (64.40, 61.42, 49.88)gm/boom, respectively. As for the efficiency of food conversion, it was a significant superiority in favor of the control treatment, as it recorded an average of (10.23) kg of feed / kg compared to the rest of the treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, the probiotic) and their recorded averages were (8.65, 7.05) , 6.12) kg of feed / kg of weight gain, respectively. \n ","PeriodicalId":101768,"journal":{"name":"University of Thi-Qar Journal of agricultural research","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Thi-Qar Journal of agricultural research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54174/utjagr.vo11.n2/24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted in the animal field of the College of Agriculture and Marshes / University of Thi- Qar from 12/30/2021 to 3/15/2022 in order to find out the effect of giving celery base and probiotic to the kids of local goats and its reflection on the productive traits. This origin in the study gave 16 formulas weighing 14.5 kg, and performed randomly on a treatment with four replications for one treatment, T1 treatments: Treating the basic ration consisting of (59% barley, 37% bran, 1% urea, 2% salts, 1% vitamins) and without added, T2 (control treatment + addition of probiotic 2%), T3 (treatment of control + addition of celery seed 5%), T4 (treatment + addition of probiotic with celery). The results of the current study showed that the addition of celery seeds and the probiotic/head/day increased the rate of weight and weight gain. The results of the first week of the experiment showed that there was no significant difference in weight despite the presence of an arithmetic increase in favor of the probiotic and celery treatment, with an average of (15.89) kg compared to With the rest of the treatments, in the second week, the moral superiority was in favor of the two treatments (the probiotic + celery and celery) whose average was 16.37 and 16.54 kg, respectively, and through the results we find a significant superiority in the treatment (the probiotic + celery) for the fourth, sixth and eighth weeks And the tenth and twelfth of the experiment, and the averages recorded for their body weights were (17.300), 18.40, 19.30, 20.30, and 21.30 kg, respectively, compared to the rest of the experiment's treatments. As for the total weight gain, the moral superiority was in favor of the probiotic treatment, as it recorded an average of (7.15) kg compared to the rest of the treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, and the control), where the average total weight increases were 5.41, 5.16, 4.19) kg, respectively. Significant superiority was noted in the daily weight gain rate in favor of the probiotic treatment, as it recorded an average daily weight gain of 85.11 (gm/day) compared to the rest of the experiment treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, control) and the average daily weight gain values ​​were (64.40, 61.42, 49.88)gm/boom, respectively. As for the efficiency of food conversion, it was a significant superiority in favor of the control treatment, as it recorded an average of (10.23) kg of feed / kg compared to the rest of the treatments (the probiotic + celery, celery, the probiotic) and their recorded averages were (8.65, 7.05) , 6.12) kg of feed / kg of weight gain, respectively.  
芹菜籽作为益生菌对地方山羊生产性状的影响
本研究于2021年12月30日至2022年3月15日在新疆喀尔省农业与沼泽学院动物场进行,旨在了解芹菜碱和益生菌对当地山羊幼仔的影响及其对生产性状的影响。本研究选取16个配方,总重14.5 kg,随机设4个重复,每组1个处理,T1处理:处理基本日粮(大麦59%、麸皮37%、尿素1%、盐2%、维生素1%)不添加,T2(对照处理+添加2%益生菌),T3(对照处理+添加5%芹菜籽),T4(处理+添加芹菜益生菌)。本研究结果表明,添加芹菜籽和益生菌/头/天提高了体重和增重速度。试验第一周的结果显示,尽管益生菌+芹菜处理的体重有算术上的增加,但与其他处理相比,体重没有显著差异,平均增加了(15.89)kg;在第二周,两种处理(益生菌+芹菜和芹菜)的道德优势分别为16.37和16.54 kg。结果表明,在试验的第4、6、8周和第10、12周,益生菌+芹菜处理具有显著的优势,其平均体重记录分别为(17.300)、18.40、19.30、20.30、21.30 kg。在总增重方面,与其他处理(益生菌+芹菜、芹菜和对照组)相比,益生菌处理的平均总增重为(7.15)kg,而其他处理的平均总增重分别为5.41、5.16、4.19)kg。在日增重率方面,益生菌处理显著优于其他处理(益生菌+芹菜、芹菜、对照),平均日增重85.11 (gm/d),平均日增重值分别为(64.40、61.42、49.88)gm/ d。在食物转化效率方面,对照处理显著优于其他处理(益生菌+芹菜、芹菜+益生菌),平均饲料转化率为(10.23)kg / kg,平均饲料转化率为(8.65、7.05、6.12)kg / kg增重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信