The “one for all lawsuit”

Katarina Barley
{"title":"The “one for all lawsuit”","authors":"Katarina Barley","doi":"10.5771/9783748921561-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until recently, many consumers who had purchased a manipulated diesel car probably thought: “How is it possible that emissions levels have been manipulated and my expensive car has dropped in value, yet the people responsible don’t have to answer for their actions? All the same, I think I’d rather let the matter rest than take on a large car manufacturer and its legal department.” And who can blame them for thinking that? Nobody really wants to be involved in a legal dispute: they’re complicated, the evidence is often ambiguous, and the risk of losing is extremely high as a result. This is precisely why adding a new mechanism under civil procedure law was the right thing to do. The result is the “one for all lawsuit”, which has been in force since 1 November 2018.","PeriodicalId":326055,"journal":{"name":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turning Point in Data Protection Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748921561-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Until recently, many consumers who had purchased a manipulated diesel car probably thought: “How is it possible that emissions levels have been manipulated and my expensive car has dropped in value, yet the people responsible don’t have to answer for their actions? All the same, I think I’d rather let the matter rest than take on a large car manufacturer and its legal department.” And who can blame them for thinking that? Nobody really wants to be involved in a legal dispute: they’re complicated, the evidence is often ambiguous, and the risk of losing is extremely high as a result. This is precisely why adding a new mechanism under civil procedure law was the right thing to do. The result is the “one for all lawsuit”, which has been in force since 1 November 2018.
“一刀切的诉讼”
直到最近,许多购买了被操纵的柴油车的消费者可能还在想:“怎么可能排放水平被操纵了,我那辆昂贵的车贬值了,而责任人却不必为他们的行为负责?”尽管如此,我认为我宁愿让这件事就此打住,也不愿与一家大型汽车制造商及其法律部门较量。”谁又能怪他们这么想呢?没有人真的想卷入法律纠纷:它们很复杂,证据往往含糊不清,因此输掉官司的风险极高。这正是为什么在民事诉讼法中增加一个新机制是正确的事情。其结果是自2018年11月1日起生效的“一次针对所有人的诉讼”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信