The Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Urolithiasis Management and Urologists in the Gulf Countries: A Survey of Urologists in GCC

Al-Naimi, T. Ibrahim, Tariq F. Al-Shaiji, Abdulqadir Alzarooni, M. Banakhar, S. Al-Busaidy, Ayman, Raees, M. Moazin
{"title":"The Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Urolithiasis Management and Urologists in the Gulf Countries: A Survey of Urologists in GCC","authors":"Al-Naimi, T. Ibrahim, Tariq F. Al-Shaiji, Abdulqadir Alzarooni, M. Banakhar, S. Al-Busaidy, Ayman, Raees, M. Moazin","doi":"10.31038/ijnus.2020211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To explore the effects of COVID-19 on urolithiasis management and on the medical practice of urologists in Gulf countries. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to urologists in the six countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The survey consisted of 23 questions about their working environment, urolithiasis management experience, and the policies of their facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: During the one-week survey period, responses were received from 191 urologists working in the six GCC countries. Responses were received from urologists in all six countries but the numbers differed markedly. Of the 191 urologists who responded, 160 (83.8%) were experienced urologists and 31 (16.2%) were urology residents. Eighty-four (44.0%) volunteered for COVID-19 management rather than urology, 22 (11.5%) were infected with COVID-19 and 38 (19.9%) sought mental health support. Clinical duties related to urolithiasis management were reduced for most of the urologists, with elective procedures postponed and urolithiasis management confined to emergency conditions. In the absence of COVID-19 infection, 67 (35.1%) preferred to actively manage ureteral stones, whereas the remaining urologists preferred less invasive methods, such as conservative or instant drainage. Conclusion: COVID-19 is hazardous to urologists in GCC countries, with 11.5% being infected and most reducing their clinical duties related to urolithiasis management. Although urolithiasis management in GCC countries during the COVID-19 pandemic was generally consistent with worldwide guidelines, some differences were observed,","PeriodicalId":133386,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Journal of Nephro-Urology Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Journal of Nephro-Urology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/ijnus.2020211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of COVID-19 on urolithiasis management and on the medical practice of urologists in Gulf countries. Methods: A web-based survey was sent to urologists in the six countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The survey consisted of 23 questions about their working environment, urolithiasis management experience, and the policies of their facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: During the one-week survey period, responses were received from 191 urologists working in the six GCC countries. Responses were received from urologists in all six countries but the numbers differed markedly. Of the 191 urologists who responded, 160 (83.8%) were experienced urologists and 31 (16.2%) were urology residents. Eighty-four (44.0%) volunteered for COVID-19 management rather than urology, 22 (11.5%) were infected with COVID-19 and 38 (19.9%) sought mental health support. Clinical duties related to urolithiasis management were reduced for most of the urologists, with elective procedures postponed and urolithiasis management confined to emergency conditions. In the absence of COVID-19 infection, 67 (35.1%) preferred to actively manage ureteral stones, whereas the remaining urologists preferred less invasive methods, such as conservative or instant drainage. Conclusion: COVID-19 is hazardous to urologists in GCC countries, with 11.5% being infected and most reducing their clinical duties related to urolithiasis management. Although urolithiasis management in GCC countries during the COVID-19 pandemic was generally consistent with worldwide guidelines, some differences were observed,
2019冠状病毒病大流行对海湾国家尿石症管理和泌尿科医生的影响:海湾国家泌尿科医生调查
目的:探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对海湾国家泌尿科医生尿石症管理和医疗实践的影响。方法:对海湾合作委员会(GCC)六个国家的泌尿科医生进行网络调查。该调查包括23个问题,涉及他们的工作环境、尿石症管理经验以及2019冠状病毒病大流行期间他们的设施政策。结果:在为期一周的调查期间,收到了来自六个海湾合作委员会国家191名泌尿科医生的回复。从所有六个国家的泌尿科医生那里收到了反馈,但数量明显不同。在191名回应的泌尿科医生中,160名(83.8%)是有经验的泌尿科医生,31名(16.2%)是泌尿科住院医师。84人(44.0%)自愿参加COVID-19管理而不是泌尿科,22人(11.5%)感染COVID-19, 38人(19.9%)寻求心理健康支持。大多数泌尿科医生减少了与尿石症管理相关的临床职责,选择性手术被推迟,尿石症管理仅限于紧急情况。在没有COVID-19感染的情况下,67名(35.1%)泌尿科医生倾向于积极治疗输尿管结石,而其余泌尿科医生则倾向于微创方法,如保守或即时引流。结论:2019冠状病毒病对海湾合作委员会国家的泌尿科医生来说是危险的,11.5%的泌尿科医生被感染,大多数泌尿科医生减少了与尿石症管理相关的临床职责。尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,海湾合作委员会国家的尿石症管理总体上与国际指导方针一致,但也观察到一些差异,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信