Politicising Security at the Boundaries: Privacy in Surveillance and Cybersecurity

Myriam Dunn Cavelty, M. Leese
{"title":"Politicising Security at the Boundaries: Privacy in Surveillance and Cybersecurity","authors":"Myriam Dunn Cavelty, M. Leese","doi":"10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article looks into the politicisation of security. Politicisation, in contrast to securitisation, presupposes that security issues are controversially debated in a public arena without foregone conclusions as to how they are going to be handled. In order to locate and observe politicisation processes empirically, we suggest to look at privacy, a key notion and main tool for resistance vis-à-vis security logics. By examining two issue areas (video surveillance and cybersecurity), we highlight different tactics through which privacy is mobilised as a boundary object to politicise security. The invocation of privacy offers an alternative viewpoint on security, one where the human (digital) body and a human centred notion of security is at the centre. The value of its integrity and the need for its protection is a weighty counter to the abstract and often absolute claims of ‘more security’ through technological means.","PeriodicalId":179359,"journal":{"name":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Issue: The Politicisation of Security: Controversy, Mobilisation, Arena Shifting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ERIS.V5I3.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article looks into the politicisation of security. Politicisation, in contrast to securitisation, presupposes that security issues are controversially debated in a public arena without foregone conclusions as to how they are going to be handled. In order to locate and observe politicisation processes empirically, we suggest to look at privacy, a key notion and main tool for resistance vis-à-vis security logics. By examining two issue areas (video surveillance and cybersecurity), we highlight different tactics through which privacy is mobilised as a boundary object to politicise security. The invocation of privacy offers an alternative viewpoint on security, one where the human (digital) body and a human centred notion of security is at the centre. The value of its integrity and the need for its protection is a weighty counter to the abstract and often absolute claims of ‘more security’ through technological means.
边界安全政治化:监视和网络安全中的隐私
本文探讨了安全问题的政治化。与证券化相反,政治化的前提是安全问题在公共领域进行有争议的辩论,而不会就如何处理这些问题得出既定结论。为了从经验上定位和观察政治化过程,我们建议看看隐私,这是抵抗-à-vis安全逻辑的关键概念和主要工具。通过研究两个问题领域(视频监控和网络安全),我们强调了将隐私作为边界对象动员起来使安全政治化的不同策略。对隐私的援引提供了另一种安全观点,其中人类(数字)身体和以人为中心的安全概念处于中心地位。其完整性的价值和对其保护的需要是对抽象的、往往是绝对的通过技术手段“提高安全性”的主张的有力反击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信