Usability, UX & Professional Communication: Revising a Graduate-Level Course to Integrate More of Rhetoric

Karen Gulbrandsen
{"title":"Usability, UX & Professional Communication: Revising a Graduate-Level Course to Integrate More of Rhetoric","authors":"Karen Gulbrandsen","doi":"10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability studies have become an important part of our curriculum in professional writing and communication, contributing to methods for analyzing our audience. But, I have often found in teaching usability a reduction of our rhetorical purpose to methods focused on navigation. Although navigation is important, I examine how we might expand our inquiry to bring more of rhetoric into our analysis. In this essay, I argue that we need to develop ways to think about the user experience from a rhetorical perspective. I also show how to help students design studies to assess how discourse positions audiences; to examine who is invited (or not); to analyze which identities are empowered and disempowered.","PeriodicalId":278101,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/procomm52174.2021.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Usability studies have become an important part of our curriculum in professional writing and communication, contributing to methods for analyzing our audience. But, I have often found in teaching usability a reduction of our rhetorical purpose to methods focused on navigation. Although navigation is important, I examine how we might expand our inquiry to bring more of rhetoric into our analysis. In this essay, I argue that we need to develop ways to think about the user experience from a rhetorical perspective. I also show how to help students design studies to assess how discourse positions audiences; to examine who is invited (or not); to analyze which identities are empowered and disempowered.
可用性、用户体验与专业沟通:修改研究生课程以融入更多修辞学内容
可用性研究已经成为我们专业写作和交流课程的重要组成部分,为分析我们的受众提供了方法。但是,我经常发现,在教授可用性的过程中,我们的修辞目的被简化为专注于导航的方法。虽然导航很重要,但我研究了如何扩大我们的调查,将更多的修辞引入我们的分析。在这篇文章中,我认为我们需要从修辞的角度来思考用户体验。我还展示了如何帮助学生设计研究来评估话语如何定位受众;检查:检查谁被邀请(或未被邀请);分析哪些身份被赋予了权力,哪些被剥夺了权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信