DIFFERENTIATION OF SELF AS A PREDICTOR OF CAPACITY FOR MENTALIZATION

Marija Todosijević, Dijana Kojić
{"title":"DIFFERENTIATION OF SELF AS A PREDICTOR OF CAPACITY FOR MENTALIZATION","authors":"Marija Todosijević, Dijana Kojić","doi":"10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to explore if the differentiation of self has a role in predicting capacity for mentalization in female samples. The data was collected using The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) and The Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) on a sample of 105 female participants, aged 18-50 years (M = 30.61, SD = 8.09). Both models containing self-differentiation as predictors were significant. The first model that predicted certainty about mental states explains 32.1% of the variance (R² = .32, F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000), with I position (β = .459, p = .000) and emotional cutoff (β = -.245, p = .024) as significant predictors. The second model that predicted uncertainty about mental states explains 40.4% of the variance (R² = .40, F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000), with age (β = .233, p = .007), education (β = -.208, p = .024), and emotional reactivity (β = .323, p = .005) as significant predictors. The obtained results indicate that different aspects of the differentiation of self can predict certainty and uncertainty about mental states in the female sample, but also that when it comes to phenomenon such as capacity for mentalization, certain sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, education) might play more important role then it was previously thought. Further research on this matter, with a bigger and more diverse sample, is strongly advised. Keywords: mentalization, self-differentiation, emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff","PeriodicalId":272628,"journal":{"name":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to explore if the differentiation of self has a role in predicting capacity for mentalization in female samples. The data was collected using The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) and The Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) on a sample of 105 female participants, aged 18-50 years (M = 30.61, SD = 8.09). Both models containing self-differentiation as predictors were significant. The first model that predicted certainty about mental states explains 32.1% of the variance (R² = .32, F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000), with I position (β = .459, p = .000) and emotional cutoff (β = -.245, p = .024) as significant predictors. The second model that predicted uncertainty about mental states explains 40.4% of the variance (R² = .40, F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000), with age (β = .233, p = .007), education (β = -.208, p = .024), and emotional reactivity (β = .323, p = .005) as significant predictors. The obtained results indicate that different aspects of the differentiation of self can predict certainty and uncertainty about mental states in the female sample, but also that when it comes to phenomenon such as capacity for mentalization, certain sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, education) might play more important role then it was previously thought. Further research on this matter, with a bigger and more diverse sample, is strongly advised. Keywords: mentalization, self-differentiation, emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff
自我分化作为心智化能力的预测因子
本研究的目的是探讨自我分化是否在预测女性心智化能力中起作用。采用反思性功能问卷(RFQ)和自我分异量表(DSI)对105名18-50岁的女性(M = 30.61, SD = 8.09)进行数据收集。包含自分化作为预测因子的两个模型都是显著的。第一个预测心理状态确定性的模型解释了32.1%的方差(R²= 0.32,F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000),其中I位置(β = .459, p = .000)和情感截止(β = -)。245, p = 0.024)为显著预测因子。第二个预测心理状态不确定性的模型解释了40.4%的方差(R²= 0.40,F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000),年龄(β = .233, p = .007),教育(β = -。208, p = 0.024)和情绪反应(β = 0.323, p = 0.005)为显著预测因子。所获得的结果表明,自我分化的不同方面可以预测女性样本中心理状态的确定性和不确定性,但也表明,当涉及到心理化能力等现象时,某些社会人口变量(如年龄、教育)可能比之前认为的更重要。强烈建议对这一问题进行更大、更多样化的进一步研究。关键词:心智化,自我分化,情绪反应,情绪切断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信