CONTEXTUAL LEARNING APPROACH AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING

Wayan Eka Mahendra
{"title":"CONTEXTUAL LEARNING APPROACH AND PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING","authors":"Wayan Eka Mahendra","doi":"10.21744/IRJMIS.V3I3.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effect of formative assessment and learning approach to the mathematics learning outcome after controlling the numerical aptitude. It was a quasi-experiment with a sample of 186 students obtained by using multistage random sampling technique with 2x2 factorial designs. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA. After controlling the numerical aptitude, the results are: the mathematics learning outcome of the students who followed a contextual approach was better than the ones who followed a conventional learning approach, the mathematics learning outcome of the students who were given a performance assessment was better than the ones who were given a conventional assessment, the interaction between the learning approach and formative assessment affected the students learning outcome for mathematics, the students who followed a contextual learning approach were more suitable to be given a performance assessment, whereas the ones who followed a conventional learning approach were more appropriate to be given a conventional assessment. Based on the research findings, junior high school teachers are suggested to improve their students learning outcome for mathematics. Then, teachers need to use a learning approach and formative assessment accurately and correctly.","PeriodicalId":262250,"journal":{"name":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21744/IRJMIS.V3I3.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of formative assessment and learning approach to the mathematics learning outcome after controlling the numerical aptitude. It was a quasi-experiment with a sample of 186 students obtained by using multistage random sampling technique with 2x2 factorial designs. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA. After controlling the numerical aptitude, the results are: the mathematics learning outcome of the students who followed a contextual approach was better than the ones who followed a conventional learning approach, the mathematics learning outcome of the students who were given a performance assessment was better than the ones who were given a conventional assessment, the interaction between the learning approach and formative assessment affected the students learning outcome for mathematics, the students who followed a contextual learning approach were more suitable to be given a performance assessment, whereas the ones who followed a conventional learning approach were more appropriate to be given a conventional assessment. Based on the research findings, junior high school teachers are suggested to improve their students learning outcome for mathematics. Then, teachers need to use a learning approach and formative assessment accurately and correctly.
情境学习方法与数学学习绩效评估
本研究旨在探讨形成性评价和学习方法对控制数字能力倾向后的数学学习结果的影响。采用多阶段随机抽样技术,采用2x2析因设计,获得186名学生的准实验。数据采用ANCOVA分析。在控制了数字能力之后,结果是:采用情境教学法的学生的数学学习成绩优于采用传统教学法的学生,采用绩效评价的学生的数学学习成绩优于采用传统教学法的学生,学习方法与形成性评价的相互作用影响了学生的数学学习成绩。遵循情境学习方法的学生更适合进行绩效评估,而遵循传统学习方法的学生更适合进行传统评估。根据研究结果,建议初中教师提高学生的数学学习成果。然后,教师需要准确正确地使用学习方法和形成性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信