Representative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles?

J. Nowak
{"title":"Representative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles?","authors":"J. Nowak","doi":"10.5771/9783748910619-393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and in the concrete case. However, a dividing line appears to be the choice between opt-in and opt-out procedures. Such is not the result of an outright refusal of the principle of opt-out procedures but because of the fact that certain procedural rights can be less easily safeguarded in an opt-out procedure than in an opt-in procedure. It appears from the Belgian and Dutch decisions that particular attention will be paid in this regard to the scope and the content of the notification measures, thereby including informal notification measures undertaken by the representative or other interested parties, as well as spontaneous coverage in the news media. More than anything else, it appears thus that adequate notification is the most important safeguard to guarantee the right to a fair trial of putative group members.","PeriodicalId":123497,"journal":{"name":"The 50th Anniversary of the European Law of Civil Procedure","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 50th Anniversary of the European Law of Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748910619-393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and in the concrete case. However, a dividing line appears to be the choice between opt-in and opt-out procedures. Such is not the result of an outright refusal of the principle of opt-out procedures but because of the fact that certain procedural rights can be less easily safeguarded in an opt-out procedure than in an opt-in procedure. It appears from the Belgian and Dutch decisions that particular attention will be paid in this regard to the scope and the content of the notification measures, thereby including informal notification measures undertaken by the representative or other interested parties, as well as spontaneous coverage in the news media. More than anything else, it appears thus that adequate notification is the most important safeguard to guarantee the right to a fair trial of putative group members.
欧盟代表(消费者)集体赔偿决定:自由流动还是公共政策障碍?
在具体的例子中。然而,选择加入和选择退出程序之间的选择似乎是一条分界线。这不是直接拒绝选择退出程序原则的结果,而是因为选择退出程序比选择加入程序更不容易保障某些程序性权利。从比利时和荷兰的决定看来,在这方面将特别注意通知措施的范围和内容,从而包括代表或其他有关方面采取的非正式通知措施,以及新闻媒介的自发报道。因此,最重要的是,充分的通知似乎是保证对假定的群体成员进行公平审判的权利的最重要的保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信