Predictors of Marital Adjustment: Are There Any Differences Between Women and Men?

A. Muraru, M. Turliuc
{"title":"Predictors of Marital Adjustment: Are There Any Differences Between Women and Men?","authors":"A. Muraru, M. Turliuc","doi":"10.5964/EJOP.V9I3.524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to explore if there are differences between women and men in relationships among family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment. Two hundred and forty-nine participants filled out four self-reported measures: The Differentiation in the Family System Scale, Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale, Experiences in Close Relationship Scale, and Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. In order to analyze the data, multiple-group analysis with AMOS 16.0 was used. There was no difference between women and men in all observed variables. Regardless of gender, only the romantic attachment was a significant predictor of marital adjustment. Only in women, family-of-origin significantly predicted their romantic attachment. Across gender groups, the configural model fitted satisfactorily the observed data. When measurement and structural weights, as well as residuals were constrained to be equal across gender groups, the invariance of the model was also supported. The results suggest women and men could be similar when it comes to the relationships among constructions they both have regarding family-of-origin experiences, romantic attachment patterns, and marital adjustment. Some implications for research and clinical practice with marital couples are briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":117577,"journal":{"name":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europe’s Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/EJOP.V9I3.524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore if there are differences between women and men in relationships among family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment. Two hundred and forty-nine participants filled out four self-reported measures: The Differentiation in the Family System Scale, Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale, Experiences in Close Relationship Scale, and Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. In order to analyze the data, multiple-group analysis with AMOS 16.0 was used. There was no difference between women and men in all observed variables. Regardless of gender, only the romantic attachment was a significant predictor of marital adjustment. Only in women, family-of-origin significantly predicted their romantic attachment. Across gender groups, the configural model fitted satisfactorily the observed data. When measurement and structural weights, as well as residuals were constrained to be equal across gender groups, the invariance of the model was also supported. The results suggest women and men could be similar when it comes to the relationships among constructions they both have regarding family-of-origin experiences, romantic attachment patterns, and marital adjustment. Some implications for research and clinical practice with marital couples are briefly discussed.
婚姻调整的预测因素:男女之间有差异吗?
本研究的目的是探讨男女在原生家庭关系、爱情依恋和婚姻调整方面是否存在差异。249名被试填写了四份自我报告量表:家庭系统差异量表、家庭适应性和凝聚力评价量表、亲密关系体验量表和修正二元调整量表。采用AMOS 16.0软件进行多组分析。在所有观察到的变量中,男女之间没有差异。无论性别如何,只有浪漫依恋是婚姻调整的重要预测因子。只有在女性中,原生家庭显著地预测了她们的爱情依恋。在不同性别群体中,配置模型与观测数据吻合良好。当测量权和结构权以及残差被约束为跨性别群体相等时,模型的不变性也得到了支持。研究结果表明,当涉及到关于原生家庭经历、浪漫依恋模式和婚姻调整的结构之间的关系时,女性和男性可能是相似的。简要讨论了对夫妻研究和临床实践的一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信