Discussion Flows: An Interactive Visualization for Analyzing Engagement in Multi-Party Meetings

Tao Wang, Mandy Keck, Zana Vosough
{"title":"Discussion Flows: An Interactive Visualization for Analyzing Engagement in Multi-Party Meetings","authors":"Tao Wang, Mandy Keck, Zana Vosough","doi":"10.2312/EVS.20211060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engagement in multi-party meetings is a key indicator of outcome. Poor attendee involvement can hinder progress and hurt team cohesion. Thus, there is a strong motivation for organizations to better understand what happens in meetings and improve upon their experience. However, analyzing multi-party meetings is a challenging task, as one needs to consider both verbal exchanges and meeting dynamics among speakers. There is currently a lack of support on these unique tasks. In this paper, we present a new visual approach to help analyze multi-party meetings in industry settings: Discussion Flows, a multi-level interactive visualization tool. Its glyph-based overview allows effortless comparison of overall interactions among different meetings, whereas the individual meeting view uses flow diagrams to convey the relative participation of different speakers throughout the meeting agenda in different levels of details. We demonstrate our approach with meeting recordings from an open source dialogue corpora and use them as the benchmark dataset. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → Information visualization; Visualization techniques; Interactive systems and tools;","PeriodicalId":224719,"journal":{"name":"Eurographics Conference on Visualization","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurographics Conference on Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2312/EVS.20211060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engagement in multi-party meetings is a key indicator of outcome. Poor attendee involvement can hinder progress and hurt team cohesion. Thus, there is a strong motivation for organizations to better understand what happens in meetings and improve upon their experience. However, analyzing multi-party meetings is a challenging task, as one needs to consider both verbal exchanges and meeting dynamics among speakers. There is currently a lack of support on these unique tasks. In this paper, we present a new visual approach to help analyze multi-party meetings in industry settings: Discussion Flows, a multi-level interactive visualization tool. Its glyph-based overview allows effortless comparison of overall interactions among different meetings, whereas the individual meeting view uses flow diagrams to convey the relative participation of different speakers throughout the meeting agenda in different levels of details. We demonstrate our approach with meeting recordings from an open source dialogue corpora and use them as the benchmark dataset. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → Information visualization; Visualization techniques; Interactive systems and tools;
讨论流程:用于分析多方会议参与的交互式可视化
参与多党会议是结果的关键指标。出席者参与度低会阻碍进展,损害团队凝聚力。因此,组织有强烈的动机去更好地理解会议中发生的事情,并改进他们的经验。然而,分析多方会议是一项具有挑战性的任务,因为需要考虑发言者之间的口头交流和会议动态。目前缺乏对这些独特任务的支持。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的可视化方法来帮助分析行业环境中的多方会议:讨论流程,一个多层次的交互式可视化工具。它基于符号的概述可以轻松地比较不同会议之间的总体交互,而单个会议视图则使用流程图来传达不同发言者在整个会议议程中不同细节级别的相对参与情况。我们用来自开源对话语料库的会议录音演示了我们的方法,并将它们用作基准数据集。•以人为本的计算→信息可视化;可视化技术;互动系统和工具;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信