Critique of the Exclusive Jurisdiction of the High Court over Statutory Marriages and Other Incidental Matters

Mabel Osato Oniha
{"title":"Critique of the Exclusive Jurisdiction of the High Court over Statutory Marriages and Other Incidental Matters","authors":"Mabel Osato Oniha","doi":"10.53982/alj.2020.0801.03-j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is common knowledge that all lawyers in Nigeria who want to file matrimonial matters bordering on Statutory Marriages head to the High Court. This is because it has been so from time immemorial and has continued to be so. It is of no contention that the High Court has jurisdiction over Statutory Marriages by law. The bone of contention rather is the seemingly exclusive jurisdiction conferred on it. What is the basis upon which this exclusivity of jurisdiction of the High Court on Act marriages lie? A thorough search through the laws has shown that there is a provision conferring jurisdiction on the High Court but non conferring exclusive Jurisdiction on same. To get to the root of this conclusion, doctrinal method was used. This revealed that other courts outside the High Court share jurisdiction with the High Court in addressing Act marriages under the Act. To cure this wrong perception among lawyers, it is recommended that the provisions of the law empowering the High Court and other Courts alongside to adjudicate on Statutory Marriages should be brought to the knowledge of the lawyers. Judges of the High Courts can help educate lawyers who appear before them.","PeriodicalId":123596,"journal":{"name":"ABUAD Law Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABUAD Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53982/alj.2020.0801.03-j","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is common knowledge that all lawyers in Nigeria who want to file matrimonial matters bordering on Statutory Marriages head to the High Court. This is because it has been so from time immemorial and has continued to be so. It is of no contention that the High Court has jurisdiction over Statutory Marriages by law. The bone of contention rather is the seemingly exclusive jurisdiction conferred on it. What is the basis upon which this exclusivity of jurisdiction of the High Court on Act marriages lie? A thorough search through the laws has shown that there is a provision conferring jurisdiction on the High Court but non conferring exclusive Jurisdiction on same. To get to the root of this conclusion, doctrinal method was used. This revealed that other courts outside the High Court share jurisdiction with the High Court in addressing Act marriages under the Act. To cure this wrong perception among lawyers, it is recommended that the provisions of the law empowering the High Court and other Courts alongside to adjudicate on Statutory Marriages should be brought to the knowledge of the lawyers. Judges of the High Courts can help educate lawyers who appear before them.
高等法院对法定婚姻和其他附带事项的专属管辖权批判
众所周知,在尼日利亚,所有想要提交与法定婚姻有关的婚姻事务的律师都要去高等法院。这是因为自古以来就是如此,而且一直如此。高等法院依法对法定婚姻有管辖权,这是无可争辩的。争论的焦点是被赋予的看似排他性的管辖权。高等法院对法案婚姻的专属管辖权的依据是什么?通过对法律的全面查阅,我们发现有一项条文赋予高等法院管辖权,但并未赋予高等法院专属管辖权。为了找到这个结论的根源,我们使用了理论的方法。这表明,高等法院以外的其他法院与高等法院共享管辖权,根据该法处理法令婚姻。为了纠正律师的这种错误观念,我们建议应让律师了解法律中授权高等法院和其他法院审理法定婚姻的条文。高等法院的法官可以帮助教育在他们面前出庭的律师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信