{"title":"On the design, implementation, and evaluation of a portable parallel database system","authors":"O. Frieder, P. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors describe a complete implementation and evaluation of a parallel relational database system. The described implementation exploits parallel algorithms initially proposed for a hypercube to achieve its speedup. Specifically, attention is given to a portable parallel database system that exploits both parallel algorithms and data parallelism to expedite database processing. Two join algorithms are evaluated. It is shown that, for joins with a comparable number of tuples in each of the two joining relations, a bucket-based approach is preferable. However, if the two relations greatly differ in size, a broadcast-based approach is preferred.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":389644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The authors describe a complete implementation and evaluation of a parallel relational database system. The described implementation exploits parallel algorithms initially proposed for a hypercube to achieve its speedup. Specifically, attention is given to a portable parallel database system that exploits both parallel algorithms and data parallelism to expedite database processing. Two join algorithms are evaluated. It is shown that, for joins with a comparable number of tuples in each of the two joining relations, a bucket-based approach is preferable. However, if the two relations greatly differ in size, a broadcast-based approach is preferred.<>