PROMOTING LIBERAL EDUCATION THROUGH THE LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF CRITICAL THINKING: A RATIONALE AND PLAN

H. Braun, Katrina Borowiec
{"title":"PROMOTING LIBERAL EDUCATION THROUGH THE LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF CRITICAL THINKING: A RATIONALE AND PLAN","authors":"H. Braun, Katrina Borowiec","doi":"10.15366/JOSPOE2021.13.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, U.S. higher education has received much criticism for inadequately preparing students for the ‘real world.’ There is substantial empirical evidence (e.g., Arum & Roksa, 2011) that many students graduate with limited proficiency in key 21st century skills such as critical thinking (CT). Despite its importance in achieving personal advancement and professional success, there has been surprisingly little rigorous research on the development of CT during the undergraduate years. We believe this is a missed opportunity for higher education to better understand the various trajectories of CT development and to generate credible evidence to inform policies, programs, and practices – while also strengthening its standing among its various stakeholders. We argue that, despite a number of challenges, it is feasible to design and implement a comprehensive, longitudinal study of the development of CT (and related constructs). Although CT is an important learning objective at all colleges, it has special resonance for schools and programs that aim to provide a liberal education. For various reasons we propose that the initial study be conducted within a particular subset of such institutions; namely, a sample of American Jesuit colleges and universities. We discuss a number of technical issues germane to such a study, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of our preferred choice of an institutional sample.","PeriodicalId":162204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education (JOSPOE)","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education (JOSPOE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/JOSPOE2021.13.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, U.S. higher education has received much criticism for inadequately preparing students for the ‘real world.’ There is substantial empirical evidence (e.g., Arum & Roksa, 2011) that many students graduate with limited proficiency in key 21st century skills such as critical thinking (CT). Despite its importance in achieving personal advancement and professional success, there has been surprisingly little rigorous research on the development of CT during the undergraduate years. We believe this is a missed opportunity for higher education to better understand the various trajectories of CT development and to generate credible evidence to inform policies, programs, and practices – while also strengthening its standing among its various stakeholders. We argue that, despite a number of challenges, it is feasible to design and implement a comprehensive, longitudinal study of the development of CT (and related constructs). Although CT is an important learning objective at all colleges, it has special resonance for schools and programs that aim to provide a liberal education. For various reasons we propose that the initial study be conducted within a particular subset of such institutions; namely, a sample of American Jesuit colleges and universities. We discuss a number of technical issues germane to such a study, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of our preferred choice of an institutional sample.
通过批判性思维的纵向研究促进通识教育:理论基础与计划
近年来,美国高等教育因未能让学生为“现实世界”做好充分准备而受到很多批评。有大量的经验证据(例如,Arum & Roksa, 2011)表明,许多学生毕业时对批判性思维(CT)等21世纪关键技能的熟练程度有限。尽管它对个人进步和职业成功很重要,但令人惊讶的是,在本科阶段,很少有关于CT发展的严谨研究。我们认为,高等教育错过了一个更好地了解CT发展的各种轨迹,并为政策、项目和实践提供可靠证据的机会,同时也加强了高等教育在各种利益相关者中的地位。我们认为,尽管存在许多挑战,但设计和实施CT(及相关结构)发展的全面纵向研究是可行的。尽管CT在所有大学都是一个重要的学习目标,但它对旨在提供通识教育的学校和项目有着特殊的共鸣。出于各种原因,我们建议在这些机构的一个特定子集中进行初步研究;也就是美国耶稣会学院和大学的样本。我们讨论了一些与这种研究相关的技术问题,以及我们首选的机构样本的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信