Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada: A national comparison

Virginie Paquet, S. van Bellen, V. Larivière
{"title":"Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada: A national comparison","authors":"Virginie Paquet, S. van Bellen, V. Larivière","doi":"10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For two decades, open access (OA) has gained momentum worldwide. However, adoption of OA in Canada is lagging compared with other countries. Using data from Dimensions and Érudit, this paper provides an overview of OA dissemination in Canada, focusing on the effect of institutions, language, and funding. Papers in French, and from Quebec universities, are more likely to be OA, while papers from engineering-oriented institutions are less likely to be OA. Regarding funders, those in health sciences have higher OA compliance. The paper concludes discussing disciplinary differences in OA dissemination, low compliance to OA mandates in Canada, and the role of Érudit.","PeriodicalId":377680,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

For two decades, open access (OA) has gained momentum worldwide. However, adoption of OA in Canada is lagging compared with other countries. Using data from Dimensions and Érudit, this paper provides an overview of OA dissemination in Canada, focusing on the effect of institutions, language, and funding. Papers in French, and from Quebec universities, are more likely to be OA, while papers from engineering-oriented institutions are less likely to be OA. Regarding funders, those in health sciences have higher OA compliance. The paper concludes discussing disciplinary differences in OA dissemination, low compliance to OA mandates in Canada, and the role of Érudit.
衡量开放获取在加拿大的流行程度:一个全国性的比较
二十年来,开放获取(OA)在全球范围内获得了发展势头。然而,与其他国家相比,加拿大对OA的采用滞后。本文利用Dimensions和Érudit提供的数据,概述了加拿大的OA传播情况,重点关注机构、语言和资金的影响。法语论文和来自魁北克大学的论文更有可能是OA,而来自工程院校的论文则不太可能是OA。就资助者而言,健康科学领域的资助者对OA的依从性较高。本文最后讨论了OA传播的学科差异、加拿大OA法规的低遵从性以及Érudit的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信