The need for richer refactoring usage data

Mohsen Vakilian, Nicholas Chen, Stas Negara, B. Rajkumar, Roshanak Zilouchian Moghaddam, Ralph E. Johnson
{"title":"The need for richer refactoring usage data","authors":"Mohsen Vakilian, Nicholas Chen, Stas Negara, B. Rajkumar, Roshanak Zilouchian Moghaddam, Ralph E. Johnson","doi":"10.1145/2089155.2089164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) support many refactorings, studies suggest that automated refactorings are used infrequently, and few developers use anything beyond Rename and Extract refactorings. Little is known about why automated refactorings are seldom used. We present a list of challenging questions whose answers are crucial for understanding the usability issues of refactoring tools. This paper argues that the existing data sources - Eclipse UDC, Eclipse refactoring histories, version control histories, etc. - are inadequate for answering these questions. Finally, we introduce our tools to collect richer usage data that will enable us to answer some of the open research questions about the usability of refactoring tools. Findings from our data will foster the design of the next generation of refactoring tools.","PeriodicalId":217446,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2089155.2089164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Even though modern Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) support many refactorings, studies suggest that automated refactorings are used infrequently, and few developers use anything beyond Rename and Extract refactorings. Little is known about why automated refactorings are seldom used. We present a list of challenging questions whose answers are crucial for understanding the usability issues of refactoring tools. This paper argues that the existing data sources - Eclipse UDC, Eclipse refactoring histories, version control histories, etc. - are inadequate for answering these questions. Finally, we introduce our tools to collect richer usage data that will enable us to answer some of the open research questions about the usability of refactoring tools. Findings from our data will foster the design of the next generation of refactoring tools.
需要更丰富的重构使用数据
尽管现代集成开发环境(ide)支持许多重构,但研究表明,自动化重构很少被使用,而且很少有开发人员使用Rename和Extract重构之外的任何东西。很少有人知道为什么很少使用自动重构。我们列出了一系列具有挑战性的问题,这些问题的答案对于理解重构工具的可用性问题至关重要。本文认为,现有的数据源——Eclipse UDC、Eclipse重构历史记录、版本控制历史记录等——不足以回答这些问题。最后,我们介绍了我们的工具来收集更丰富的使用数据,这将使我们能够回答一些关于重构工具可用性的开放性研究问题。我们的数据发现将促进下一代重构工具的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信