Effect of a universal adhesive on shear bond strengths of metal orthodontic brackets

A. Oz, Kadir Kolcuoğlu, A. Oz, E. Karaman
{"title":"Effect of a universal adhesive on shear bond strengths of metal orthodontic brackets","authors":"A. Oz, Kadir Kolcuoğlu, A. Oz, E. Karaman","doi":"10.5505/yeditepe.2019.57966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author: Assist. Prof. Aslıhan Zeynep Oz Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Samsun Phone: 0362 312 1919-8188, 05057038107 SUMMARY Aim: Due to the development in operative dentistry, some new bonding systems have been presented. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the use of a last generation universal adhesive on in vitro shear bond strengths and compare with controls. Material and methods: This study was conducted with 68-extracted human premolar. The samples divided in to four groups. In-group 1, enamel surfaces were etched and brackets were bonded with Transbond XT adhesive primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). In-group 2, one-step self-etching primer (Transbond plus self-etching primer, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was used. In group 3 teeth were etched 37% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds and brackets were bonded with universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond, Kuraray, Noritake Dental Inc.) In-group 4, universal adhesive was used on self-etching mode. The same adhesive paste (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and light-curing times were used in all groups. Shear bond strengths of the samples were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). The amount of residual adhesive index (ARI) was also evaluated. Results: The mean shear bond strength values of 4 groups were 13.42±5.09 Mpa, 11.57±3.12 Mpa, 11.15±3.08, Mpa, 11,38±3.04 Mpa, respectively. There was no significant difference between the shear bond strengths of the groups. There was also no significant difference between the ARI scores. Conclusion: Universal adhesives can be used safely for orthodontic bracket bonding with etch or self-etching mode.","PeriodicalId":166138,"journal":{"name":"Yeditepe Dental Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeditepe Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/yeditepe.2019.57966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Corresponding author: Assist. Prof. Aslıhan Zeynep Oz Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Samsun Phone: 0362 312 1919-8188, 05057038107 SUMMARY Aim: Due to the development in operative dentistry, some new bonding systems have been presented. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the use of a last generation universal adhesive on in vitro shear bond strengths and compare with controls. Material and methods: This study was conducted with 68-extracted human premolar. The samples divided in to four groups. In-group 1, enamel surfaces were etched and brackets were bonded with Transbond XT adhesive primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). In-group 2, one-step self-etching primer (Transbond plus self-etching primer, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) was used. In group 3 teeth were etched 37% phosphoric acid for 10 seconds and brackets were bonded with universal adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond, Kuraray, Noritake Dental Inc.) In-group 4, universal adhesive was used on self-etching mode. The same adhesive paste (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and light-curing times were used in all groups. Shear bond strengths of the samples were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). The amount of residual adhesive index (ARI) was also evaluated. Results: The mean shear bond strength values of 4 groups were 13.42±5.09 Mpa, 11.57±3.12 Mpa, 11.15±3.08, Mpa, 11,38±3.04 Mpa, respectively. There was no significant difference between the shear bond strengths of the groups. There was also no significant difference between the ARI scores. Conclusion: Universal adhesives can be used safely for orthodontic bracket bonding with etch or self-etching mode.
通用胶粘剂对金属正畸托槽剪切粘接强度的影响
通讯作者:Assist。Aslıhan Zeynep Oz Ondokuz Mayıs大学牙科学院,三星正畸系电话:0362 312 1919-8188,05057038107摘要目的:由于牙科手术的发展,一些新的粘接系统已经提出。本研究的目的是研究使用上一代通用粘合剂对体外剪切粘接强度的影响,并与对照进行比较。材料与方法:以68根提取的人前磨牙为材料进行研究。这些样本被分成四组。在第一组中,牙釉质表面蚀刻,托槽用Transbond XT粘合底漆(3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif .)粘合。在第2组中,使用一步自蚀刻处理剂(Transbond加自蚀刻处理剂,3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA)。第3组采用37%磷酸10秒蚀刻,托槽采用通用胶粘剂(Clearfil universal Bond, Kuraray, Noritake Dental Inc.)粘接。第4组采用通用胶粘剂自蚀刻模式。所有组均使用相同的黏合剂(Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, california)和光固化时间。采用方差分析(ANOVA)对样品的剪切粘接强度进行比较。并对残余粘接指数(ARI)进行了评价。结果:4组抗剪强度平均值分别为13.42±5.09 Mpa、11.57±3.12 Mpa、11.15±3.08、Mpa、11、38±3.04 Mpa。各组间剪切粘接强度无显著差异。ARI评分之间也没有显著差异。结论:通用粘接剂可安全用于正畸托槽的刻蚀或自刻蚀粘接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信