Survival rates and quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

M. M. Zufarov, N. Makhkamov, T. Khafizov
{"title":"Survival rates and quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair","authors":"M. M. Zufarov, N. Makhkamov, T. Khafizov","doi":"10.54203/jlsb.2022.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Aim. This study aimed to assess patients' quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods. The clinical data of 42 patients (mean age of 58.7±4.1 years, 32 men, 10 women) underwent TEVAR from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 2.7±0.25 years. The thoracic aortic aneurysm was diagnosed in 11 out of 42 cases. TEVAR was performed in 31 of 42 patients with aortic dissection (24 cases had type B, 4 cases had type \"neither A nor B\", and 3 had type A). Hybrid surgeries were performed in 12 patients, including 3 significant surgeries with prosthetics of the ascending and aortic arch, 3 cases with parallel carotid-subclavian bypass, and 6 of patients with stenting of the common carotid artery and endoprosthesis replacement of the left subclavian artery. Results. The cumulative survival rate at 30 days was 97.6%, 6-month survival was 88.1%, and 3-year survival was 85.7%. The dynamics of assessments by SF-36 domains showed that after TEVAR, vital activity and mental health fields were the most effective. So, if before TEVAR in the binding activity domain, the average quality of life was 63.8±7.2, then after 12 months, the indicator increased with a statistically significant differenceto 86.2±6.4 (P<0.001). The patient's mental health improved significantly with SF-36 scores after TEVAR rate of 77.4±4.4. Also. All other domains enhanced considerably compared to the pre-TEVAR survey results (P<0.01). Conclusion. TEVAR showed high efficiency with significant improvement in the general condition and quality of life of patients.","PeriodicalId":113264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54203/jlsb.2022.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Aim. This study aimed to assess patients' quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods. The clinical data of 42 patients (mean age of 58.7±4.1 years, 32 men, 10 women) underwent TEVAR from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 2.7±0.25 years. The thoracic aortic aneurysm was diagnosed in 11 out of 42 cases. TEVAR was performed in 31 of 42 patients with aortic dissection (24 cases had type B, 4 cases had type "neither A nor B", and 3 had type A). Hybrid surgeries were performed in 12 patients, including 3 significant surgeries with prosthetics of the ascending and aortic arch, 3 cases with parallel carotid-subclavian bypass, and 6 of patients with stenting of the common carotid artery and endoprosthesis replacement of the left subclavian artery. Results. The cumulative survival rate at 30 days was 97.6%, 6-month survival was 88.1%, and 3-year survival was 85.7%. The dynamics of assessments by SF-36 domains showed that after TEVAR, vital activity and mental health fields were the most effective. So, if before TEVAR in the binding activity domain, the average quality of life was 63.8±7.2, then after 12 months, the indicator increased with a statistically significant differenceto 86.2±6.4 (P<0.001). The patient's mental health improved significantly with SF-36 scores after TEVAR rate of 77.4±4.4. Also. All other domains enhanced considerably compared to the pre-TEVAR survey results (P<0.01). Conclusion. TEVAR showed high efficiency with significant improvement in the general condition and quality of life of patients.
胸椎血管内主动脉修复术后患者的生存率及生活质量
介绍。的目标。本研究旨在评估胸血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)后患者的生活质量。方法。分析2016 - 2022年接受TEVAR治疗的42例患者(平均年龄58.7±4.1岁,男性32例,女性10例)的临床资料。平均随访时间为2.7±0.25年。42例中有11例被诊断为胸主动脉瘤。42例主动脉夹层患者中31例(B型24例,“非A、非B”4例,A型3例)行TEVAR手术。12例患者行混合手术,其中3例采用升主动脉弓假体,3例采用颈动脉-锁骨下平行搭桥,6例采用颈总动脉支架置入术和左锁骨下动脉假体置换术。结果。30天累积生存率为97.6%,6个月生存率为88.1%,3年生存率为85.7%。SF-36领域的动态评估表明,TEVAR后,生命活动和心理健康领域最有效。因此,如果TEVAR在结合活性域前,平均生活质量为63.8±7.2,那么在12个月后,该指标增加到86.2±6.4,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。TEVAR评分为77.4±4.4后,SF-36评分显著改善。也。与tevar前的调查结果相比,其他所有领域均显著增强(P<0.01)。结论。TEVAR疗效显著,患者的一般情况和生活质量均有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信