Ethnocentricity of the Nationalist Discourse

B. Parekh
{"title":"Ethnocentricity of the Nationalist Discourse","authors":"B. Parekh","doi":"10.1111/J.1354-5078.1995.00025.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter challenges the dominant view that nationalism is basically a European phenomenon, first emerging in Europe and then spreading to the rest of the world and taking identical forms. This view gives Europe both too much importance and too much responsibility for the world’s ills. Nationalism did emerge in Europe, but every non-European country conceptualised it and blended it with local ideas in its own way and gave it a distinct form. In some societies it was based on religion; in others on ethnicity, language or civilisation. Some had a ‘pan’ element and that too varied from region to region. In many of these societies liberalism was not a dominant tradition, and hence nationalism did not have to come to terms with it or define itself in relation to it. All this means that there were and are multiple nationalisms, each unique but also sharing some common features with others.","PeriodicalId":166998,"journal":{"name":"Ethnocentric Political Theory","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnocentric Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1354-5078.1995.00025.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

This chapter challenges the dominant view that nationalism is basically a European phenomenon, first emerging in Europe and then spreading to the rest of the world and taking identical forms. This view gives Europe both too much importance and too much responsibility for the world’s ills. Nationalism did emerge in Europe, but every non-European country conceptualised it and blended it with local ideas in its own way and gave it a distinct form. In some societies it was based on religion; in others on ethnicity, language or civilisation. Some had a ‘pan’ element and that too varied from region to region. In many of these societies liberalism was not a dominant tradition, and hence nationalism did not have to come to terms with it or define itself in relation to it. All this means that there were and are multiple nationalisms, each unique but also sharing some common features with others.
民族主义话语中的种族中心主义
这一章挑战了主流观点,即民族主义基本上是一种欧洲现象,首先出现在欧洲,然后传播到世界其他地区,并采取相同的形式。这种观点认为,欧洲对世界的弊病既过于重要,又负有太多责任。民族主义确实出现在欧洲,但每个非欧洲国家都将其概念化,并以自己的方式将其与当地思想混合,并赋予其独特的形式。在一些社会中,它是基于宗教的;在其他种族,语言或文明方面。有些有“泛”元素,而且因地区而异。在许多这样的社会里,自由主义并不是一个占主导地位的传统,因此民族主义不必与自由主义妥协,也不必根据自由主义来定义自己。所有这些都意味着,过去和现在都存在着多种民族主义,每种民族主义都是独特的,但也有一些共同的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信