On the Correctness of Some Notions in Public Communication

Hristo Atanasov
{"title":"On the Correctness of Some Notions in Public Communication","authors":"Hristo Atanasov","doi":"10.55206/eubj6983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Writing the current article is motivated by the desire to clarify the use of terms and concepts in communication: public, media, business. Inaccuracies are found in the use of some concepts, which requires clari¬fication. The text presents the positions of leading scholars and experts in law, public administration and political science. The text does not claim to be either authoritative or comprehensive but introduces some restrictions and clarifications. The presentation of the meanings of the concepts is not from a linguistic point of view. Each of the terms (state, state bodies, in-stitution, powers, proxies, law-making, law enforcement and judicial, hu¬man rights protection body and law enforcement; status (statute) is clarified after a critical review of expert publications. The text is rather practical and would be useful for those working in the fields of public administration, communications, and media as well as for Bulgarian citizens. Keywords: state, state bodies, institution, powers, authority, law-making, law-enforcement and law-enforcement, status, statute.","PeriodicalId":215869,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric and Communications","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55206/eubj6983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Writing the current article is motivated by the desire to clarify the use of terms and concepts in communication: public, media, business. Inaccuracies are found in the use of some concepts, which requires clari¬fication. The text presents the positions of leading scholars and experts in law, public administration and political science. The text does not claim to be either authoritative or comprehensive but introduces some restrictions and clarifications. The presentation of the meanings of the concepts is not from a linguistic point of view. Each of the terms (state, state bodies, in-stitution, powers, proxies, law-making, law enforcement and judicial, hu¬man rights protection body and law enforcement; status (statute) is clarified after a critical review of expert publications. The text is rather practical and would be useful for those working in the fields of public administration, communications, and media as well as for Bulgarian citizens. Keywords: state, state bodies, institution, powers, authority, law-making, law-enforcement and law-enforcement, status, statute.
论公共传播中某些观念的正确性
摘要:写这篇文章的动机是希望澄清术语和概念在传播中的使用:公众,媒体,商业。有些概念的使用不准确,需要澄清。本文介绍了法律、公共行政和政治学领域的主要学者和专家的立场。本文并不声称是权威或全面,但介绍了一些限制和澄清。概念意义的呈现不是从语言学的观点出发的。各术语(国家、国家机关、国家事业单位、权力机关、代理人、立法机关、执法司法机关、人权保障机构和执法机关);地位(法规)在对专家出版物进行严格审查后得到澄清。案文相当实用,对公共行政、通讯和媒体领域的工作人员以及保加利亚公民都很有用。关键词:国家、国家机关、制度、权力、权威、立法、执法与执法、地位、成文法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信