The poet of Turkish communism

V. Fouskas
{"title":"The poet of Turkish communism","authors":"V. Fouskas","doi":"10.1080/14613190701217019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his doctoral dissertation published by I. B. Tauris in 1997 as: A Clash of Empires; Turkey between Russian Bolshevism and British Imperialism, 1918–1923, Gökay, managing a vast amount of primary and secondary sources, presented an elegant international history thesis on the shaping of modern Turkey. One is tempted to say that a sociological equivalent of Gökay’s earlier work can be found in the work by Niyazi Berkes, The Development of Secularism in Turkey, first published in 1964 by McGill University Press. Whereas Berkes, a sociologist of Cypriot origin, is focusing on the social, economic and cultural/religious processes of the transformation of the late Ottoman Empire and early modern Turkey in an international and interactive context, Gökay masterfully analyses the geo-political dynamics of the First World War in relation to the Eastern Question. The argument is that the settlements produced after the Kemalist victory in Anatolia over imperial Britain’s proxy, Greece, represented not merely an arrangement between Greece and Turkey, but rather a much broader geo-political understanding over the fate of the Middle East and Central Asia. In effect, the Clash of Empires established that modern Turkey arose out of a decades-long fierce geo-political struggle between Britain and Russia in the Balkans, the Middle East and Central Asia and that this is the locus in which the Eastern Question and the ‘Great Game’ cross each other. Moreover, it argued that early Soviet policy towards early modern Turkey had, in the main, followed the general foreign policy principles of the Russian Empire towards the Eastern Mediterranean, the Straits and the Caucasus/Central Asia. Soviet Eastern Policy and Turkey, as the author acknowledges in the Introduction, is a sequel of this earlier work, although in between there has been a significant corpus of intellectual production, ranging from edited volumes on the issue of Caspian oil, to monographs on Eastern Europe and US neo-imperial foreign policy. Soviet Eastern Policy and Turkey looks at the ways in which the USSR attempted to manipulate Turkish elites (to a lesser extent) and Turkish communism (to a greater extent) for geo-political purposes and in order","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190701217019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his doctoral dissertation published by I. B. Tauris in 1997 as: A Clash of Empires; Turkey between Russian Bolshevism and British Imperialism, 1918–1923, Gökay, managing a vast amount of primary and secondary sources, presented an elegant international history thesis on the shaping of modern Turkey. One is tempted to say that a sociological equivalent of Gökay’s earlier work can be found in the work by Niyazi Berkes, The Development of Secularism in Turkey, first published in 1964 by McGill University Press. Whereas Berkes, a sociologist of Cypriot origin, is focusing on the social, economic and cultural/religious processes of the transformation of the late Ottoman Empire and early modern Turkey in an international and interactive context, Gökay masterfully analyses the geo-political dynamics of the First World War in relation to the Eastern Question. The argument is that the settlements produced after the Kemalist victory in Anatolia over imperial Britain’s proxy, Greece, represented not merely an arrangement between Greece and Turkey, but rather a much broader geo-political understanding over the fate of the Middle East and Central Asia. In effect, the Clash of Empires established that modern Turkey arose out of a decades-long fierce geo-political struggle between Britain and Russia in the Balkans, the Middle East and Central Asia and that this is the locus in which the Eastern Question and the ‘Great Game’ cross each other. Moreover, it argued that early Soviet policy towards early modern Turkey had, in the main, followed the general foreign policy principles of the Russian Empire towards the Eastern Mediterranean, the Straits and the Caucasus/Central Asia. Soviet Eastern Policy and Turkey, as the author acknowledges in the Introduction, is a sequel of this earlier work, although in between there has been a significant corpus of intellectual production, ranging from edited volumes on the issue of Caspian oil, to monographs on Eastern Europe and US neo-imperial foreign policy. Soviet Eastern Policy and Turkey looks at the ways in which the USSR attempted to manipulate Turkish elites (to a lesser extent) and Turkish communism (to a greater extent) for geo-political purposes and in order
土耳其共产主义诗人
1997年,i.b. Tauris发表了他的博士论文《帝国的冲突》;《俄国布尔什维克主义和英国帝国主义之间的土耳其,1918-1923》,Gökay,整理了大量的一手和第二手资料,提出了一篇关于现代土耳其形成的优雅的国际历史论文。人们很想说,在Niyazi Berkes的著作《土耳其世俗主义的发展》中可以找到与Gökay早期著作相当的社会学著作,该书于1964年由麦吉尔大学出版社首次出版。鉴于Berkes,塞浦路斯出身的社会学家,专注于在国际和互动背景下晚期奥斯曼帝国和早期现代土耳其转型的社会,经济和文化/宗教进程,Gökay巧妙地分析了与东方问题有关的第一次世界大战的地缘政治动态。他们的论点是,凯末尔主义者在安纳托利亚战胜大英帝国的代理人希腊后达成的协议,不仅代表了希腊和土耳其之间的一种安排,而且代表了对中东和中亚命运更广泛的地缘政治理解。实际上,《帝国的冲突》确立了现代土耳其是英国和俄罗斯在巴尔干半岛、中东和中亚地区长达数十年的激烈地缘政治斗争的产物,这是东方问题和“大博弈”相互交叉的地方。此外,它认为苏联早期对近代早期土耳其的政策大体上遵循了俄罗斯帝国对东地中海、海峡和高加索/中亚的一般外交政策原则。正如作者在引言中所承认的那样,《苏联东方政策与土耳其》是这一早期著作的续集,尽管在这两者之间有大量的知识产物,从关于里海石油问题的编辑卷,到关于东欧和美国新帝国主义外交政策的专著。《苏联东方政策与土耳其》着眼于苏联为了地缘政治目的和秩序而试图操纵土耳其精英(在较小程度上)和土耳其共产主义(在更大程度上)的方式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信