ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF HOUSE FLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L. IN EGYPT

Ahmed Abd El-Raheem, Mohamed Swelam
{"title":"ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF HOUSE FLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L. IN EGYPT","authors":"Ahmed Abd El-Raheem, Mohamed Swelam","doi":"10.21608/ejcp.2014.239292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two species of entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Filipjev) and Steinernema feltiae ( Poinar ) at five doses (50, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 IJs / treatment), were examined against house fly, Musca domestica L. larvae under laboratory and field conditions. Under laboratory conditions, S. feltiae gave the highest mortality percentages with the nematode doses of 2000 and 1000 IJs / treatment, giving 67.50% and 54.97%, respectively, while the doses of 50 and 100 IJs gave unsatisfactory control results estimating by 20% and 32.50%, respectively. In addition, H. bacteriophora nematode gave the highest mortality percentages with the nematode doses of 2000 IJs and 1000 IJs / treatment, giving 55.85% and 45.83%, respectively, while the doses of 50 IJs and 100 IJs gave the least control results estimating by 14.15% and 15%, respectively. Meanwhile, under field conditions the highest reduction percentages of house fly larvae were recorded with the treatment of H. bacteriophora (100.000 IJs / treatment) giving only 8 live larvae after one month of treating 3000 house fly larvae resulted 91.8% mortality, while the treatment of S. feltiae (100.000 IJs / treatment) gave 14.38 live larvae from 3000 treated equaling 85.2% mortality without significant differences between them.","PeriodicalId":168502,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Crop Protection","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejcp.2014.239292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two species of entomopathogenic nematodes Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Filipjev) and Steinernema feltiae ( Poinar ) at five doses (50, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 IJs / treatment), were examined against house fly, Musca domestica L. larvae under laboratory and field conditions. Under laboratory conditions, S. feltiae gave the highest mortality percentages with the nematode doses of 2000 and 1000 IJs / treatment, giving 67.50% and 54.97%, respectively, while the doses of 50 and 100 IJs gave unsatisfactory control results estimating by 20% and 32.50%, respectively. In addition, H. bacteriophora nematode gave the highest mortality percentages with the nematode doses of 2000 IJs and 1000 IJs / treatment, giving 55.85% and 45.83%, respectively, while the doses of 50 IJs and 100 IJs gave the least control results estimating by 14.15% and 15%, respectively. Meanwhile, under field conditions the highest reduction percentages of house fly larvae were recorded with the treatment of H. bacteriophora (100.000 IJs / treatment) giving only 8 live larvae after one month of treating 3000 house fly larvae resulted 91.8% mortality, while the treatment of S. feltiae (100.000 IJs / treatment) gave 14.38 live larvae from 3000 treated equaling 85.2% mortality without significant differences between them.
昆虫病原线虫在埃及家蝇生物防治中的应用
在室内和野外试验条件下,测定了两种昆虫病原线虫(异habditis bacteriophora, Filipjev)和feltiae Steinernema feltiae (Poinar, Poinar)在50、100、500、1000和2000 IJs /次处理下对家蝇幼虫的侵染效果。在实验室条件下,线虫剂量为2000和1000 IJs /次时,蝇蛆的死亡率最高,分别为67.50%和54.97%,而50和100 IJs剂量的控制结果不理想,分别为20%和32.50%。2000 IJs和1000 IJs /次处理时,吸乳杆菌线虫的死亡率最高,分别为55.85%和45.83%,50 IJs和100 IJs处理的控制效果最低,分别为14.15%和15%。同时,在田间条件下,吸乳杆菌(10万ij /次)处理的家蝇幼虫减少率最高,处理3000只家蝇1个月后,只产生8只活幼虫,死亡率为91.8%,而蝇蛆(10万ij /次)处理的3000只家蝇中,有14.38只活幼虫,死亡率为85.2%,两者差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信