338 Same day discharge in minimally invasive surgery for gynaecological cancer

C. Hickish, J. Dilley, S. Abdi, S. Phadnis, E. Brockbank
{"title":"338 Same day discharge in minimally invasive surgery for gynaecological cancer","authors":"C. Hickish, J. Dilley, S. Abdi, S. Phadnis, E. Brockbank","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/Background*Same-day discharge (SDD) has been found to be safe and attainable following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynaecological cancer.1 We audited the compliance to SDD, opposed to 24 hours discharge, at the Royal London Hospital.MethodologyWe performed a retrospective audit of all minimally invasive hysterectomies performed at the Royal London Hospital in 2019 and 2020. All patients were identified for SDD at pre-op clinic and were followed up until 30 days post discharge.Data was collected from electronic patient to record demographic, operating time & outcome, postoperative recovery (+/- complication and readmission) and time of discharge.Following the first audit cycle in 2019, interventions were performed comprising of staff education to highlight the human factors that led to failed SDD (including delayed prescriptions, discharge summaries and removal of catheters).Result(s)*A total of 12 patients were selected for SDD in 2020 compared to 22 in 2019 with 30 day follow up for all patients. Numbers of patient in 2020 was reduced due to covid. Successful SDD was achieved in 42% of cases in 2020 compared to 56% in 2019. Of those planned for SDD, 50% of those that failed were due to unavoidable intraoperative complications. No SDD discharges in 2020 failed due to pharmacy, transport or discharge documentation delays (7 failed SDD in 2019 due to these factors). No re-admissions or complications were recorded.Conclusion*Same day discharge continues to be safe and achievable following minimally invasive surgery for gynecological cancer, despite disruption from the Covid-19 pandemic. Auditing and implementation of interventions helps improve this pathway.ReferenceKorsholm M, Mogensen O, Jeppesen MM, Lysdal VK, Traen K, Jensen PT. Systematic review of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017 Feb;136(2):128–137. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12023. Epub 2016 Nov 11. PMID: 28099736.","PeriodicalId":253349,"journal":{"name":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization of gynaecological cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2021-esgo.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/Background*Same-day discharge (SDD) has been found to be safe and attainable following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gynaecological cancer.1 We audited the compliance to SDD, opposed to 24 hours discharge, at the Royal London Hospital.MethodologyWe performed a retrospective audit of all minimally invasive hysterectomies performed at the Royal London Hospital in 2019 and 2020. All patients were identified for SDD at pre-op clinic and were followed up until 30 days post discharge.Data was collected from electronic patient to record demographic, operating time & outcome, postoperative recovery (+/- complication and readmission) and time of discharge.Following the first audit cycle in 2019, interventions were performed comprising of staff education to highlight the human factors that led to failed SDD (including delayed prescriptions, discharge summaries and removal of catheters).Result(s)*A total of 12 patients were selected for SDD in 2020 compared to 22 in 2019 with 30 day follow up for all patients. Numbers of patient in 2020 was reduced due to covid. Successful SDD was achieved in 42% of cases in 2020 compared to 56% in 2019. Of those planned for SDD, 50% of those that failed were due to unavoidable intraoperative complications. No SDD discharges in 2020 failed due to pharmacy, transport or discharge documentation delays (7 failed SDD in 2019 due to these factors). No re-admissions or complications were recorded.Conclusion*Same day discharge continues to be safe and achievable following minimally invasive surgery for gynecological cancer, despite disruption from the Covid-19 pandemic. Auditing and implementation of interventions helps improve this pathway.ReferenceKorsholm M, Mogensen O, Jeppesen MM, Lysdal VK, Traen K, Jensen PT. Systematic review of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017 Feb;136(2):128–137. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12023. Epub 2016 Nov 11. PMID: 28099736.
338妇科肿瘤微创手术当日出院
介绍/背景*妇科癌症微创手术(MIS)后,当日出院(SDD)已被发现是安全且可实现的我们审计了伦敦皇家医院对SDD的遵守情况,而不是24小时出院。方法:我们对2019年和2020年在伦敦皇家医院进行的所有微创子宫切除术进行了回顾性审计。所有患者均在术前门诊确诊为SDD,随访至出院后30天。从电子病历中收集数据,记录人口统计学、手术时间和结果、术后恢复(+/-并发症和再入院)和出院时间。在2019年的第一个审计周期之后,进行了包括员工教育在内的干预措施,以突出导致SDD失败的人为因素(包括延迟处方、出院总结和拔除导管)。结果* 2020年共有12名患者被选中进行SDD,而2019年为22名,所有患者随访30天。由于新冠肺炎,2020年的患者人数有所减少。2020年成功实现SDD的比例为42%,而2019年为56%。在计划进行SDD的患者中,50%的失败是由于不可避免的术中并发症。2020年没有由于药房、运输或出院文件延迟而导致SDD放电失败(2019年由于这些因素导致7例SDD失败)。无再入院或并发症记录。*尽管受到Covid-19大流行的影响,妇科癌症微创手术后的当天出院仍然是安全的,并且可以实现。审计和实施干预措施有助于改善这一途径。参考文献ekorsholm M, Mogensen O, Jeppesen MM, Lysdal VK, Traen K, Jensen PT.微创子宫切除术后当日出院的系统评价。国际妇产科杂志2017年2月;136(2):128-137。doi: 10.1002 / ijgo.12023。Epub 2016年11月11日PMID: 28099736。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信