The Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreement:Lessons Learned from the Lone Star Case

Hanbit Min
{"title":"The Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Agreement:Lessons Learned from the Lone Star Case","authors":"Hanbit Min","doi":"10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The award of the Lone Star case was, at last, dispatched to the Parties on August 31, 2022. As the Tribunal determined that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over claims allegedly occurred after the 2011 Korea-Belgium𐄁Luxembourg BIT became effective on March 27, 2011, the key issue was allegations of misconduct by the Financial Services Commission in the sale of the Korean Exchange Bank shares to the Hana financial group. The Tribunal concluded that the Financial Services Commission acted arbitrarily as it was motivated by political reasons and, therefore, had failed to provide Fair and Equitable Treatment under the 2011 Korea-Belgium𐄁Luxembourg BIT. In order to review the Lone Star case critically, this paper firstly analyzes international arbitration cases relating to Fair and Equitable Treatment, and then examines legal implications of the Lone Star case. On top of that, this paper reviews the ways to stipulate Fair and Equitable Treatment under International Investment Agreements based on legal implications derived from the Lone Star case.","PeriodicalId":398961,"journal":{"name":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute of Legal Myongji University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53066/mlr.2023.21.2.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The award of the Lone Star case was, at last, dispatched to the Parties on August 31, 2022. As the Tribunal determined that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over claims allegedly occurred after the 2011 Korea-Belgium𐄁Luxembourg BIT became effective on March 27, 2011, the key issue was allegations of misconduct by the Financial Services Commission in the sale of the Korean Exchange Bank shares to the Hana financial group. The Tribunal concluded that the Financial Services Commission acted arbitrarily as it was motivated by political reasons and, therefore, had failed to provide Fair and Equitable Treatment under the 2011 Korea-Belgium𐄁Luxembourg BIT. In order to review the Lone Star case critically, this paper firstly analyzes international arbitration cases relating to Fair and Equitable Treatment, and then examines legal implications of the Lone Star case. On top of that, this paper reviews the ways to stipulate Fair and Equitable Treatment under International Investment Agreements based on legal implications derived from the Lone Star case.
国际投资协议中的公平与公平待遇:龙星基金案例的教训
龙星案的裁决书最终于2022年8月31日发给双方当事人。法庭对2011年3月27日生效的《2011年韩国-比利时𐄁Luxembourg双边投资协定》(BIT)后发生的诉讼具有管辖权,因此,核心问题是金融委员会涉嫌向韩亚金融集团出售外换银行股份的不当行为。裁判所认为,金融委员会是出于政治目的,在2011年签订的《韩国-比利时𐄁Luxembourg双边投资协定》(BIT)中,没有提供公平和公正的待遇。为了批判性地回顾龙星案,本文首先分析了与公平与公平待遇相关的国际仲裁案例,然后考察了龙星案的法律含义。在此基础上,本文结合龙星基金案例的法律启示,回顾了国际投资协定中公平与公平待遇的规定途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信