Bird feathers as a non-invasive method for ecotoxicological monitoring; a rapid review

A. Adeogun, A. Chukwuka, A. Fadahunsi, K. D. Okali, P. G. Oluwakotanmi, O. R. Ibor, P. Emasoga, T. U. Egware
{"title":"Bird feathers as a non-invasive method for ecotoxicological monitoring; a rapid review","authors":"A. Adeogun, A. Chukwuka, A. Fadahunsi, K. D. Okali, P. G. Oluwakotanmi, O. R. Ibor, P. Emasoga, T. U. Egware","doi":"10.4314/tzool.v20i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decline in animal population with resulting risk of eventual disruption of ecosystem functioning has necessitated moves towards non-invasive sampling methods for ecotoxicological studies. These efforts have focused on developing sampling methodologies geared towards prioritizing conservation of biodiversity. Using a rapid review approach, 106 articles covering peer-reviewed studies, theses, and manuscripts under peer-review quantifying contaminants in feathers were examined. Meta-analysis of extracted information (n=91) revealed that most studies on feather contaminants originate from Europe (47.6 %) and Asia (32.9%), with a higher occurrence of such studies between 2015 and 2020. The most utilized feather-type across studies were body feathers (28.6%) and tail feathers (20%). Majority of the studies (60.5%) used feathers alone to estimate contaminant exposure and uptake; 14.8% used feathers and blood, while 12.3% used feathers and soft tissues (liver, kidney, muscle etc.). Inferences from the review reveal that feathers as a non-invasive sampling method provide advantages by having contaminant concentrations that are relatable with internal organs of birds, captures information on ambient contaminant concentrations based on exogenous contributions and application for historic studies. However, some available data indicate that selective uptake of some metals in organs of species could significantly reduce the number of contaminants stored in feathers and may limit its accuracy for biomonitoring. Furthermore, the different degrees of external deposition of persistent organic contaminants (PCBs, PBDEs, etc) onto the feather surface due to differential degradability/metabolization may limit the use of feathers to estimate exogenous effects. Nonetheless, while feathers have been used successfully as a non-invasive method for ecotoxicological monitoring of metals, metalloids and organic pollutants, knowledge on bird ontogeny and contaminant-specific trends in feathers could improve the accuracy of monitoring. Further efforts towards broadening the impact and advancement of this field method in future studies of avian research especially in developing countries is recommended.","PeriodicalId":426223,"journal":{"name":"Zoologist (The)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologist (The)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/tzool.v20i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decline in animal population with resulting risk of eventual disruption of ecosystem functioning has necessitated moves towards non-invasive sampling methods for ecotoxicological studies. These efforts have focused on developing sampling methodologies geared towards prioritizing conservation of biodiversity. Using a rapid review approach, 106 articles covering peer-reviewed studies, theses, and manuscripts under peer-review quantifying contaminants in feathers were examined. Meta-analysis of extracted information (n=91) revealed that most studies on feather contaminants originate from Europe (47.6 %) and Asia (32.9%), with a higher occurrence of such studies between 2015 and 2020. The most utilized feather-type across studies were body feathers (28.6%) and tail feathers (20%). Majority of the studies (60.5%) used feathers alone to estimate contaminant exposure and uptake; 14.8% used feathers and blood, while 12.3% used feathers and soft tissues (liver, kidney, muscle etc.). Inferences from the review reveal that feathers as a non-invasive sampling method provide advantages by having contaminant concentrations that are relatable with internal organs of birds, captures information on ambient contaminant concentrations based on exogenous contributions and application for historic studies. However, some available data indicate that selective uptake of some metals in organs of species could significantly reduce the number of contaminants stored in feathers and may limit its accuracy for biomonitoring. Furthermore, the different degrees of external deposition of persistent organic contaminants (PCBs, PBDEs, etc) onto the feather surface due to differential degradability/metabolization may limit the use of feathers to estimate exogenous effects. Nonetheless, while feathers have been used successfully as a non-invasive method for ecotoxicological monitoring of metals, metalloids and organic pollutants, knowledge on bird ontogeny and contaminant-specific trends in feathers could improve the accuracy of monitoring. Further efforts towards broadening the impact and advancement of this field method in future studies of avian research especially in developing countries is recommended.
鸟类羽毛作为一种无创生态毒理学监测方法快速回顾
动物种群数量的减少导致了生态系统功能最终被破坏的风险,因此有必要采用非侵入性采样方法进行生态毒理学研究。这些努力的重点是发展抽样方法,以便优先保护生物多样性。使用快速审查的方法,106篇文章涵盖同行评议的研究,论文和手稿在同行评议下量化羽毛中的污染物进行了审查。对提取的信息(n=91)进行荟萃分析显示,大多数关于羽毛污染物的研究来自欧洲(47.6%)和亚洲(32.9%),2015年至2020年期间这类研究的发生率较高。所有研究中使用最多的羽毛类型是体毛(28.6%)和尾羽(20%)。大多数研究(60.5%)仅使用羽毛来估计污染物暴露和吸收;14.8%的人使用羽毛和血液,12.3%的人使用羽毛和软组织(肝、肾、肌肉等)。从综述中得出的结论表明,羽毛作为一种非侵入性采样方法,具有与鸟类内部器官相关的污染物浓度、基于外源贡献捕获环境污染物浓度信息和历史研究应用的优势。然而,一些现有的数据表明,某些金属在物种器官中的选择性吸收可以显著减少储存在羽毛中的污染物数量,并可能限制其生物监测的准确性。此外,由于降解/代谢的差异,持久性有机污染物(多氯联苯、多溴二苯醚等)在羽毛表面的外部沉积程度不同,这可能会限制羽毛用于评估外源影响的使用。然而,虽然羽毛已经成功地作为一种非侵入性方法用于金属、类金属和有机污染物的生态毒理学监测,但对鸟类个体发育和羽毛中污染物特异性趋势的了解可以提高监测的准确性。建议进一步努力扩大这一实地方法在今后鸟类研究中的影响和进步,特别是在发展中国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信