Deliberative Politics through Citizens’ Participatory Democracy: A model for Africa Political Processes

Andrew Enaifoghe
{"title":"Deliberative Politics through Citizens’ Participatory Democracy: A model for Africa Political Processes","authors":"Andrew Enaifoghe","doi":"10.22610/JSDS.V10I1(S).2807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the present crisis of democratic governance or administration in Africa and examines the elective capability of deliberative majority rules system of democracy, in which the desire of the general public is educated by mindful, engaged citizen’s commitment and conversation. There are various questions needing answers; are the various and spellbound citizenry even equipped for consultation? How likely is amass thought of deliberation to achieve a very much contemplated choice? Wouldn’t it gather consultation reproduce a similar power lopsided characteristics blocking different sorts of talk? Deliberative models are displayed in principle and practical discourse, with contextual investigations including the furious populism of the Brexit vote, the ascent of deliberative components. What the contributing creators do share is the acknowledgement that the authenticity of appointive portrayal or representatives endures when individuals in the majority rule system of governments end up frustrated, disillusioned, and repelled. This study gives challenging and convincing thoughts regarding how to re-establish confidence in popular democratic governments by making them stronger and responsive. This study adopted a qualitative method of analysis.","PeriodicalId":297443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Development Sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Development Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22610/JSDS.V10I1(S).2807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the present crisis of democratic governance or administration in Africa and examines the elective capability of deliberative majority rules system of democracy, in which the desire of the general public is educated by mindful, engaged citizen’s commitment and conversation. There are various questions needing answers; are the various and spellbound citizenry even equipped for consultation? How likely is amass thought of deliberation to achieve a very much contemplated choice? Wouldn’t it gather consultation reproduce a similar power lopsided characteristics blocking different sorts of talk? Deliberative models are displayed in principle and practical discourse, with contextual investigations including the furious populism of the Brexit vote, the ascent of deliberative components. What the contributing creators do share is the acknowledgement that the authenticity of appointive portrayal or representatives endures when individuals in the majority rule system of governments end up frustrated, disillusioned, and repelled. This study gives challenging and convincing thoughts regarding how to re-establish confidence in popular democratic governments by making them stronger and responsive. This study adopted a qualitative method of analysis.
通过公民参与民主的协商政治:非洲政治进程的典范
本文探讨了非洲目前的民主治理或行政危机,并考察了民主协商多数规则制度的选举能力,在这种制度下,普通公众的愿望是通过有意识的、参与的公民的承诺和对话来教育的。有各种各样的问题需要回答;形形色色的、被迷住了的公民们是否做好了咨询的准备?经过深思熟虑后做出一个深思熟虑的选择的可能性有多大?聚集磋商难道不会再现类似的权力不平衡特征,阻碍不同类型的谈话吗?协商模式在原则和实践话语中得到展示,背景调查包括英国脱欧投票的愤怒民粹主义,协商成分的上升。这些有贡献的创作者所分享的是,他们承认,当多数人统治的政府体系中的个人最终感到沮丧、幻灭和排斥时,任命的形象或代表的真实性会持续下去。这项研究提出了具有挑战性和令人信服的想法,关于如何通过使人民民主政府更强大和反应迅速来重建对他们的信心。本研究采用定性分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信