Determining Major Items of Scheduled Maintenance for Apartment through Case Data: Focused on Improving the Establishment Standard for Long-term Repair Program

Sanghoon Song, Seok-Je Lee, Seong-Sik Park
{"title":"Determining Major Items of Scheduled Maintenance for Apartment through Case Data: Focused on Improving the Establishment Standard for Long-term Repair Program","authors":"Sanghoon Song, Seok-Je Lee, Seong-Sik Park","doi":"10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.1.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long-term repair program is significant as the execution standard for apartment in repair construction, and provides the basis for effective facility management through appropriation reserve and preventive maintenance. Considering its importance, the government legislates the items, cycle, and ratio for long-term repair. However, the frequent changes, controversies on repair, and difficulties in using appropriation reserve are caused as the items have not been revised on time reflecting up-to-date construction technologies. In order to resolve these problems, it is required to improve the standard by evaluating the appropriateness of repair items throughout the analysis of actual conditions. This study aims to suggest the revision plan for the criteria with the major items based on the status identified by the actual long-term repair programs and historical repair construction data. To do this, the adoption ratios of items to program are reviewed by collecting the real cases of the long-term repair programs. Developing improvement plan was approached in two ways such as “exclusion method” deleting minimum unnecessary items and “selection method” sorting out items with high adoption ratio and evidence of repair in a positive manner. Aa a result, the major items were identified as 118 items and 73 items by exclusion method and selection method respectively from the current 147 items. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute enhancing the practicality of the standard in that the regulation for long-term repair program should periodically reflect the status of currently applied construction methods and materials.","PeriodicalId":365439,"journal":{"name":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LHI journal of land, housing, and urban affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5804/LHIJ.2016.7.1.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The long-term repair program is significant as the execution standard for apartment in repair construction, and provides the basis for effective facility management through appropriation reserve and preventive maintenance. Considering its importance, the government legislates the items, cycle, and ratio for long-term repair. However, the frequent changes, controversies on repair, and difficulties in using appropriation reserve are caused as the items have not been revised on time reflecting up-to-date construction technologies. In order to resolve these problems, it is required to improve the standard by evaluating the appropriateness of repair items throughout the analysis of actual conditions. This study aims to suggest the revision plan for the criteria with the major items based on the status identified by the actual long-term repair programs and historical repair construction data. To do this, the adoption ratios of items to program are reviewed by collecting the real cases of the long-term repair programs. Developing improvement plan was approached in two ways such as “exclusion method” deleting minimum unnecessary items and “selection method” sorting out items with high adoption ratio and evidence of repair in a positive manner. Aa a result, the major items were identified as 118 items and 73 items by exclusion method and selection method respectively from the current 147 items. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute enhancing the practicality of the standard in that the regulation for long-term repair program should periodically reflect the status of currently applied construction methods and materials.
通过案例数据确定公寓定期维修的主要项目:着眼于提高长期维修计划的编制标准
长期维修方案作为公寓维修施工的执行标准具有重要意义,并通过拨款储备和预防性维修为有效的设施管理提供依据。考虑到其重要性,政府规定了长期维修的项目、周期和比例。但是,由于没有反映最新的建设技术,及时修改项目,导致了频繁的变更和维修争议,以及拨款准备金的使用困难。为了解决这些问题,需要在对实际情况分析的全过程中,通过评价维修项目的适宜性来提高标准。本研究旨在根据实际长期维修计划及历史维修建设资料所识别的状况,提出主要项目标准的修订方案。为了做到这一点,通过收集长期维修计划的实际案例,审查项目对计划的采用率。改进方案的制定采用“排除法”剔除最少不必要项目和“选择法”积极整理采用率高、有修复证据的项目两种方法。结果,从现有的147个项目中,通过排除法和选择法分别鉴定出主要项目118个和73个。本研究的结果将有助于提高标准的实用性,因为长期维修计划的规定应定期反映当前应用的施工方法和材料的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信