Origins and Pawns Scales: A Pilot Study Assessing Perception of Control in Adults with Hearing Problems

L. Allan, Rebecca J. Kelly-Campbell
{"title":"Origins and Pawns Scales: A Pilot Study Assessing Perception of Control in Adults with Hearing Problems","authors":"L. Allan, Rebecca J. Kelly-Campbell","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The main purpose of this pilot study was to determine if a content analysis of locus of control (Origins and Pawns Scales) can be used reliably with a population of older adults with hearing impairment. A second purpose of this pilot study was to determine the relationship between locus of control using this content analysis and audiologic variables such as hearing aid adoption and self-perceived hearing handicap. Finally, the third purpose of this pilot study was to determine if there were any differences between older men’s and women’s perception of locus of control as measured by this content analysis. \n Methods: A total of 30 adults with hearing impairment between the ages of 52 and 71 years participated in this study. Information regarding hearing ability, participant demographics, hearing aid adoption, and self-perceived hearing handicap were obtained. To obtain data for the content analysis, participants were required to respond to a single prompting question, which was transcribed verbatim and coded according to the refined Origins and Pawns scoring guidelines. \n Results: The content analysis of locus of control (Origins and Pawns Scales) had high internal consistency and intra-class correlations. Additionally, participants who adopted hearing aids had significantly higher origins scores than those who did not adopt. Conversely, participants who did not adopt hearing aids had higher pawns scores, however this finding was not statistically significant. There was no significant relationship between Origins and Pawns Scales and self-perceived hearing handicap nor were any gender differences found. \n Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that the Origins and Pawns Scales can be used reliably to assess the perception of locus of control for older adults with hearing impairment who present for clinical services. Both the Origins and Pawns Scales differentiated older adults who adopted hearing aids from those who did not. The Origins and Pawns Scales may prove to assist clinicians in addressing hearing aid adoption rates through targeting perceptions of control.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this pilot study was to determine if a content analysis of locus of control (Origins and Pawns Scales) can be used reliably with a population of older adults with hearing impairment. A second purpose of this pilot study was to determine the relationship between locus of control using this content analysis and audiologic variables such as hearing aid adoption and self-perceived hearing handicap. Finally, the third purpose of this pilot study was to determine if there were any differences between older men’s and women’s perception of locus of control as measured by this content analysis. Methods: A total of 30 adults with hearing impairment between the ages of 52 and 71 years participated in this study. Information regarding hearing ability, participant demographics, hearing aid adoption, and self-perceived hearing handicap were obtained. To obtain data for the content analysis, participants were required to respond to a single prompting question, which was transcribed verbatim and coded according to the refined Origins and Pawns scoring guidelines. Results: The content analysis of locus of control (Origins and Pawns Scales) had high internal consistency and intra-class correlations. Additionally, participants who adopted hearing aids had significantly higher origins scores than those who did not adopt. Conversely, participants who did not adopt hearing aids had higher pawns scores, however this finding was not statistically significant. There was no significant relationship between Origins and Pawns Scales and self-perceived hearing handicap nor were any gender differences found. Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that the Origins and Pawns Scales can be used reliably to assess the perception of locus of control for older adults with hearing impairment who present for clinical services. Both the Origins and Pawns Scales differentiated older adults who adopted hearing aids from those who did not. The Origins and Pawns Scales may prove to assist clinicians in addressing hearing aid adoption rates through targeting perceptions of control.
起源与棋子量表:一项评估听力障碍成人控制知觉的初步研究
目的:本初步研究的主要目的是确定控制点(起源和典当量表)的内容分析是否可以可靠地用于老年听力障碍人群。本初步研究的第二个目的是通过内容分析来确定控制点与听力变量(如助听器的使用和自我感觉的听力障碍)之间的关系。最后,本初步研究的第三个目的是通过内容分析来确定老年男性和女性对控制点的感知是否存在差异。方法:30名年龄在52 ~ 71岁之间的听力障碍成人参与了本研究。获得有关听力能力、参与者人口统计、助听器采用和自我感觉听力障碍的信息。为了获得用于内容分析的数据,参与者被要求回答一个提示问题,该问题被逐字转录并根据精炼的起源和典当评分准则进行编码。结果:控制源(起源和棋子量表)的内容分析具有较高的内部一致性和类内相关性。此外,采用助听器的参与者的起源分数明显高于未采用助听器的参与者。相反,没有使用助听器的参与者的棋子得分更高,但这一发现没有统计学意义。起源和棋子量表与自我认知听力障碍之间无显著关系,性别差异也不存在。结论:本研究结果表明,起源和典当量表可以可靠地用于评估老年听力障碍患者的控制位点知觉。《起源》和《典当》量表都区分了采用助听器和未采用助听器的老年人。起源与典当量表可以通过控制感知来帮助临床医生解决助听器采用率问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信