Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Criteria Analysis for 3D Printer Selection in Additive Manufacturing

Peerapat Khamhong, Chokechai Yingviwatanapong, K. Ransikarbum
{"title":"Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Criteria Analysis for 3D Printer Selection in Additive Manufacturing","authors":"Peerapat Khamhong, Chokechai Yingviwatanapong, K. Ransikarbum","doi":"10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3 Dimensional Printing (3DP) has globally gained popularity from using digital technology in various applications. However, process planning for 3DP is challenged by different materials, technologies, and printer sizes, which impact efficient and effective use of 3DP. In this study, we evaluate the factors/criteria that are related to selecting the best alternative of 3D printers by analyzing two types of decision makers, which are 1) 3DP technical experts and 2) 3DP users. Next, we employ Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) to analyze criteria weights for 3D printer selection-related factors. In particular, factors concerning 3D printed product, 3D printer characteristics, and material properties are considered in this evaluation with a number of associated sub-factors. The initial results show that the most essential factor for both types of decision makers is product factor, followed by material, and printer, respectively. Group decision analysis shows relative weights to be 0.534 (53.4 %) for product factor, 0.301 (30.1 %) for material factor, and 0.175 (17.5%) for printer factor, respectively.","PeriodicalId":404700,"journal":{"name":"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RI2C48728.2019.8999950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3 Dimensional Printing (3DP) has globally gained popularity from using digital technology in various applications. However, process planning for 3DP is challenged by different materials, technologies, and printer sizes, which impact efficient and effective use of 3DP. In this study, we evaluate the factors/criteria that are related to selecting the best alternative of 3D printers by analyzing two types of decision makers, which are 1) 3DP technical experts and 2) 3DP users. Next, we employ Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) to analyze criteria weights for 3D printer selection-related factors. In particular, factors concerning 3D printed product, 3D printer characteristics, and material properties are considered in this evaluation with a number of associated sub-factors. The initial results show that the most essential factor for both types of decision makers is product factor, followed by material, and printer, respectively. Group decision analysis shows relative weights to be 0.534 (53.4 %) for product factor, 0.301 (30.1 %) for material factor, and 0.175 (17.5%) for printer factor, respectively.
基于模糊层次分析法(AHP)的增材制造3D打印机选择准则分析
增材制造(AM)或三维打印(3DP)在全球范围内通过在各种应用中使用数字技术而受到欢迎。然而,3d打印的工艺规划受到不同材料、技术和打印机尺寸的挑战,这影响了3d打印的高效和有效使用。在这项研究中,我们通过分析两种类型的决策者,即1)3D打印技术专家和2)3D打印用户,来评估与选择最佳3D打印机替代品相关的因素/标准。其次,采用模糊层次分析法(Fuzzy AHP)对3D打印机选型相关因素进行权重分析。特别是,有关3D打印产品,3D打印机特性和材料特性的因素在本评估中考虑了许多相关的子因素。初步结果表明,对于两类决策者来说,最重要的因素分别是产品因素,其次是材料因素和打印机因素。群体决策分析显示,产品因素的相对权重为0.534(53.4%),材料因素的相对权重为0.301(30.1%),打印机因素的相对权重为0.175(17.5%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信