Comparison of SPT and Vs-based Liquefaction Assessment on Young Volcanic Sediment: A Case Study in Bantul District of Yogyakarta, Indonesia

A. Amalina, T. Fathani, W. Wilopo
{"title":"Comparison of SPT and Vs-based Liquefaction Assessment on Young Volcanic Sediment: A Case Study in Bantul District of Yogyakarta, Indonesia","authors":"A. Amalina, T. Fathani, W. Wilopo","doi":"10.21776/ub.civense.2022.00502.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On May 26, 2006, an earthquake of moment magnitude (Mw) 6.3 occurred in Yogyakarta. The damages found in Bantul were predicted to be caused by liquefaction. Moreover, liquefaction symptoms were found, such as a sand boil and lateral spreading. It inferred that the damage was controlled by the amplification factors from young volcanic sediments that are redeposited and altered volcaniclastics from the active Mount Merapi. This study compared subsurface conditions based on two field investigation methods (SPT and Shear Wave Velocity) and determined the liquefaction potential by considering groundwater and the region's seismicity. Several equations to represent the N-SPT and Vs data were also analyzed to obtain the most fitted equation. As a result, several equations used in this study were inadequate to properly correlate N-SPT and Vs. A comparison of safety factor values indicated that the liquefaction potential in the studied area on the Vs-based method is lower than the result from the SPT-based method","PeriodicalId":432135,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.civense.2022.00502.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On May 26, 2006, an earthquake of moment magnitude (Mw) 6.3 occurred in Yogyakarta. The damages found in Bantul were predicted to be caused by liquefaction. Moreover, liquefaction symptoms were found, such as a sand boil and lateral spreading. It inferred that the damage was controlled by the amplification factors from young volcanic sediments that are redeposited and altered volcaniclastics from the active Mount Merapi. This study compared subsurface conditions based on two field investigation methods (SPT and Shear Wave Velocity) and determined the liquefaction potential by considering groundwater and the region's seismicity. Several equations to represent the N-SPT and Vs data were also analyzed to obtain the most fitted equation. As a result, several equations used in this study were inadequate to properly correlate N-SPT and Vs. A comparison of safety factor values indicated that the liquefaction potential in the studied area on the Vs-based method is lower than the result from the SPT-based method
基于SPT和vs的年轻火山沉积物液化评价比较——以印尼日惹Bantul地区为例
2006年5月26日,日惹发生矩震级(Mw) 6.3的地震。在班图尔发现的破坏预计是由液化引起的。此外,还发现了液化症状,如砂沸腾和横向扩散。推断其破坏受默拉皮活火山火山碎屑岩再沉积和蚀变的年轻火山沉积物的放大因子控制。通过对比两种野外调查方法(SPT和横波速度)的地下条件,结合地下水和该地区的地震活动性,确定了液化潜力。还分析了代表N-SPT和v数据的几个方程,以获得最拟合的方程。因此,本研究中使用的几个方程不足以正确地将N-SPT和vs关联起来。安全系数值的比较表明,基于vs的方法在研究区域的液化潜力低于基于spt的方法的结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信